Thread View: sci.misc
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by Joe Hanus - Botany
Thu, 09 Feb 1989 06:32
??ban on mailing plant pathogens??
Author: Joe Hanus - Botany
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 1989 06:32
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 1989 06:32
13 lines
1244 bytes
1244 bytes
The fall 1988 news letter of ATCC discusses a proposed ban on mailing of all etiological (disease causing) agents. It is not clear from the article if the proposed ban extends to plant pathogens or infectious agents of agricultural importance. Can anyone clarify this for me? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Joe Hanus | E-MAIL hanusj@bionette.ucs.orst.edu Dept. of Botany and Plant Pathology | Phone (503)-754-3451 Oregon State University | Corvallis, OR 97331-2902 | ______________________________________________________________________________
Re: Gene Pool (for the last time!)
Author: Vincent J. Erickson
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 1989 15:10
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 1989 15:10
20 lines
1844 bytes
1844 bytes
Let's please stop this pointless discussion about the "weakening" of the human gene pool. The gene pool is not "weakened" by the survival of those individuals who in the past would have died. There are far, far too many individuals in the species for that to ocurr. There is only one way to weaken a species' gene pool. Kill off all but a few of the individuals of the species (ala the California Condor). Limiting the gene pool to a few, inbred individuals is how a gene pool is weakened. The wide variety and range of human individuals guarantees that the human gene pool remains digustingly strong. If there was a way to keep certain individuals from reproducing, it would not be those who are unfortunate enough to suffer from rare hereditary diseases, but those who post enormously callous and stupid things about how such individuals are to be seen as "weakening" the overall health of the human species. I have never ceased to be amazed at the shallowness of some "educated" people. So easy it is to lower other people's status, until they are "infections" in the gene pool. If sick or disabled people make you uncomfortable, see a psychiatrist. If Hitler had, maybe the dream of a "master race" would have saved some millions of "substandard" people their fates in the gas chambers.
Re: Gene Pool (for the last time!)
Author: Ethan Tecumseh Vishniac
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 1989 15:16
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 1989 15:16
26 lines
1828 bytes
1828 bytes
In article <1277@meccsd.MECC.MN.ORG>, vin@meccsd.MECC.MN.ORG (Vincent J. Erickson) writes:
> Let's please stop this pointless discussion about the "weakening" of
> the human gene pool.
Let's *not* shut it down prematurely. This discussion has been a classic
example of how a stupid suggestion can spark a number of interesting
and intelligent postings.
>
> If sick or disabled people make you uncomfortable, see a psychiatrist.
> If Hitler had, maybe the dream of a "master race" would have saved
> some millions of "substandard" people their fates in the gas chambers.
Alternatively, we could start a discussion on the very low success rate
of modern psychiatry. :-(
In any case, Hitler did not hold a gun to the heads of millions of Germans
and force them to murder so many innocent people. The seductiveness
of racist mythology to otherwise normal people seems pretty well established.
--
I'm not afraid of dying Ethan Vishniac, Dept of Astronomy, Univ. of Texas
I just don't want to be {charm,ut-sally,ut-emx,noao}!utastro!ethan
there when it happens. (arpanet) ethan@astro.AS.UTEXAS.EDU
- Woody Allen (bitnet) ethan%astro.as.utexas.edu@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
These must be my opinions. Who else would bother?
Re: Gene Pool (not for the last time)
Author: Ethan Tecumseh Vishniac
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 1989 15:11
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 1989 15:11
38 lines
2613 bytes
2613 bytes
In an article I wrote: (in response to the double quoted message)
> >
> > If sick or disabled people make you uncomfortable, see a psychiatrist.
> > If Hitler had, maybe the dream of a "master race" would have saved
> > some millions of "substandard" people their fates in the gas chambers.
>
> Alternatively, we could start a discussion on the very low success rate
> of modern psychiatry. :-(
>
> In any case, Hitler did not hold a gun to the heads of millions of Germans
> and force them to murder so many innocent people. The seductiveness
> of racist mythology to otherwise normal people seems pretty well established.
I have since received a private mail message acusing me of comparing
Nazis and third world nations, and making excuses for the Nazis.
I can't understand the first part, but maybe I should amplify my
point about the Nazis.
For the record, I think my comments can be interpreted as insulting
to modern psychiatry (but not very), but the primary point was that
the holocaust was not entirely, or even primarily, due to Hitler.
Otherwise normal people succumbed to an insane set of racist beliefs
and went out and murdered people. The holocaust is generally considered
to be unique due to the number of victims and the allegedly civilized nature
of the German nation, but smaller incidents with disturbingly similar elements
are not uncommon in history. To call on psychiatry to treat this problem
is a little like calling on a local fire department to snuff Mauna Loa.
Eugenics was used to rationalize many elements of the Nazi atrocities.
I think what disturbs many of us about Mr. Morimoto's comments is the
memory of this connection.
--
I'm not afraid of dying Ethan Vishniac, Dept of Astronomy, Univ. of Texas
I just don't want to be {charm,ut-sally,ut-emx,noao}!utastro!ethan
there when it happens. (arpanet) ethan@astro.AS.UTEXAS.EDU
- Woody Allen (bitnet) ethan%astro.as.utexas.edu@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
These must be my opinions. Who else would bother?
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads