Article View: sci.nanotech
Article #864Re: Homebrewed STM
From: Glenn Durden
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 21:19
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 21:19
28 lines
2102 bytes
2102 bytes
ajackson@phoenix.princeton.edu (Andrew William Jackson) writes: >In article <Jan.19.22.33.54.1993.23032@planchet.rutgers.edu> ewstroup@cc.utah.edu (ERIC W. STROUP) writes: >> I agree with you completely. Building a STM/AFM from scratch would >>give valuable insight into its workings. >Reading a few scientific papers would give you valuable insight into its >workings. >ajackson@ernie.princeton.edu About 2 or 3 years ago I investigated the possibility of making my own STM (and I presume you meamn Scanning Tunnelling Microscope, since I came in late on this), and although the electronincs for scanning seemed relatively easy for anyone with a few years experience, the biggest (unresolved) problem I found was the actual movement mechanism. From reading up on the topic, it seemed peizo electric devices were easy to manipulate - ie: you gave the things a voltage, and would deform a particular abount... however I couldnt find any piezo-electric devices that behaved thi (excuse the formatting of this pls) err.. that behaved this way with DC voltages. Given a AC volatge, they would deform as expected (and beep if the frequency was above a few hundred Hz... but given a DC voltage, they would behave like a capacitor, in that they wouldnt deform to any measurable amount, and like a capacitor, would absorb a charge. Since scanning rates in STM's arent quick, this effectively killed my 'project', since I couldnt find a peizo electric device that would do what I needed (ie: deform to a given voltage). So... to any people who HAVE built one, what did you use?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Jan.25.16.19.14.1993.9868@planchet.rutgers.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!flop.ENGR.ORST.EDU!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!planchet.rutgers.edu!nanotechShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!flop.ENGR.ORST.EDU!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!planchet.rutgers.edu!nanotech From: alfa@werple.apana.org.au (Glenn Durden) Newsgroups: sci.nanotech Subject: Re: Homebrewed STM Message-ID: <Jan.25.16.19.14.1993.9868@planchet.rutgers.edu> Date: 25 Jan 93 21:19:14 GMT Article-I.D.: planchet.Jan.25.16.19.14.1993.9868 Sender: nanotech@planchet.rutgers.edu Organization: werple public-access unix, Melbourne Lines: 28 Approved: nanotech@aramis.rutgers.edu