Article View: sci.nanotech
Article #957Actual designs
From: ROSSEN
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 1990 05:45
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 1990 05:45
21 lines
1541 bytes
1541 bytes
I'm curious to know if anyone out there is working on extensive designs
of actual nanodevices, even though there is no practical method of
assembling them yet. I know that some really simple building blocks have
been proposed (e.g. carbyne rods) but I wonder if anything really extensive
has been done.
A while back I saw a Scientific American article that told how some MIT
students had designed a Tinker-Toy computer. Sounds like good practice
for aspiring nano-engineers...
Erik Rossen
[Eric is doing some fairly thoroughgoing designs, primarily as existence
proofs. Most serious nanotech fans (like me) seem to have dabbled in
a few fairly high-level type schemes but not to have done any
"engineering-level" work the way Eric has. One major reason is that
nobody (including Eric) expects the actual designs he's doing right now
to get built--by the time they're possible, they'll look like Babbage's
computer, and faster, more effective, and economical designs will have
evolved, probably using a lot of QM which our current designs go to
lots of trouble to keep out!
--JoSH]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Jan.6.00.45.25.1990.29066@athos.rutgers.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!nanotechShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!nanotech From: ROSSEN@triumfer.bitnet Newsgroups: sci.nanotech Subject: Actual designs Message-ID: <Jan.6.00.45.25.1990.29066@athos.rutgers.edu> Date: 6 Jan 90 05:45:26 GMT Sender: nanotech@athos.rutgers.edu Lines: 21 Approved: nanotech@aramis.rutgers.edu