Thread View: sci.nanotech
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Malcolm McMahon
Fri, 22 Jan 1993 04:18
Re: Organic Machines?
Author: Malcolm McMahon
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 04:18
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 04:18
26 lines
1858 bytes
1858 bytes
I did have the interesting thought that animals can be regarded as a cell's solution to the problem of boldly going where no cell has gone before; as a way of generating a cell-friendly local environment in globally hostile environments and as a means of travelling vast distances. It strikes me that in many cases nanotechnology might benefit from the same approach for much the same reasons. For example nanomachines might build a temporary containment structure to fulfill their environmental requirements while they did the real job. More relevantly if you wanted a large group of nanomachines to do some job for you (we must think of a collective noun for a group of nanomachines) in an inaccessible place the best approach might be to have them form some temporary macroscopic mobile structure, probably with linked nanomachines forming a shell and fuel and raw materials inside. It might well ressemble an insect; it depends on the kind of mobility required. It might fly or burrow, crawl or swim. It might have wheels or legs, fins or jets. It might change shape to cope with different obstacles. Malcolm McMahon [That's essentially what the Utility Fog is... By the way I'll have a presentation of the U. Fog at VISION-21 (the NASA thing this March). --JoSH]
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads