🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.cond-matter
Article #44

Re: Neutrino Masses

#44
From: Matt Carey
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:47
26 lines
2681 bytes

"Gordon D. Pusch" wrote:
>
> The majority of the neutrinos left over from the Big Bang *were* in
> thermal equilibrium at the time they decoupled, i.e., at the time the
> Universe became essentially ``transparent'' to neutrinos ca. 1 sec
> after the Big Bang (``ABB'' :-); however, since then cosmic expansion
> has ``cooled'' them in the same sense that photons have ``cooled,''
> and like photons, most of them are not in thermal equilbrium with
> _ANYTHING_ anymore, since the average neutrino (or BB photon!) now has
> a negligible probability of EVER interacting with ANYTHING ever again...
> (Unless, of course, the ``Accelerating Universe'' claims turn out
> to be wrong, and the Universe re-collapses after all!).

Hello,

here's a question,  since these initial neutrinos took off at the 
speed of light (or slightly under if they have any mass), would
we ever see them?  Since there is no reason for them to ever turn
around, aren't they at the edge of the expanding universe?  The
neutrinos we see would then, likely, be relative newcommers.

I could be wrong here, but that is what my intuition says.

Matt
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3B54DCA5.CCB64198@ieee.org>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-was.dfn.de!znr.news.ans.net!news.chips.ibm.com!newsfeed.btv.ibm.com!news.btv.ibm.com!not-for-mail
References: <a786eec.0107151054.5e5c867b@posting.google.com> <3B51F2D9.CEB79A8B@hate.spam.net> <3B5390E4.6056173A@ieee.org> <3B54A1A6.BE529082@grc.nasa.gov> <m266crnrcy.fsf@pusch.xnet.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1141dc,f4dfcde22ee4c9c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid1141dc,public
X-Google-Thread: 104752,f4dfcde22ee4c9c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid104752,public
X-Google-Thread: 100065,f4dfcde22ee4c9c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid100065,public
X-Google-Thread: 106ae0,f4dfcde22ee4c9c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ae0,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-17 17:54:28 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-was.dfn.de!znr.news.ans.net!news.chips.ibm.com!newsfeed.btv.ibm.com!news.btv.ibm.com!not-for-mail
From: Matt Carey <matt.carey@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.cond-matter,sci.materials,sci.mech.fluids,fj.sci.matter
Subject: Re: Neutrino Masses
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:47:33 -0700
Organization: IBM Global Services North -- Burlington, Vermont, USA
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <3B54DCA5.CCB64198@ieee.org>
References: <a786eec.0107151054.5e5c867b@posting.google.com> <3B51F2D9.CEB79A8B@hate.spam.net> <3B5390E4.6056173A@ieee.org> <3B54A1A6.BE529082@grc.nasa.gov> <m266crnrcy.fsf@pusch.xnet.com>
Reply-To: matt.carey@ieee.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: carey1.almaden.ibm.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.btv.ibm.com 995417081 19192 9.1.18.139 (18 Jul 2001 00:44:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@btv.ibm.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Jul 2001 00:44:41 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en