🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.cond-matter
Article #49

Re: Neutrino Masses

#49
From: Matt Carey
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 17:05
26 lines
2629 bytes

"Gordon D. Pusch" wrote:

> This is known as a ``hypothetical'' question, i.e., a ``what if?''
> *IF* it where possible for neutrinos to be at equilibrium at what
> humans consider ``room temperature,'' what would their mean speed be?
> (Note that the question is not entirely silly --- somewhere between
> the neutrino decoupling time (T_\nu ~= 1e10 Kelvin) and the current
> epoch (T_\nu ~= 2 Kelvin), they must have passed through T_\nu ~= 300 K...

It wasn't orginally posed as a hypothetical question, but that isn't 
really important.

Why would the original neutrinos have cooled at all?  Another
odd statement by the other poster mentions "thermalized" neutrinos.

Once in the universe as we know it now, how do you thermalize a
neutrino?
Can it scatter elastically off some other particle?  Even if it could
the huge mass difference would require a large number of such
collisions.
For a particle with nearly zero cross section for any interaction,
it wouldn't seem likely that a neutrino would thermalize.

Matt
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3B55C1DC.E342796E@ieee.org>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-was.dfn.de!znr.news.ans.net!news.chips.ibm.com!newsfeed.btv.ibm.com!gazette.almaden.ibm.com!not-for-mail
References: <a786eec.0107151054.5e5c867b@posting.google.com> <3B51F2D9.CEB79A8B@hate.spam.net> <3B5390E4.6056173A@ieee.org> <3B54A1A6.BE529082@grc.nasa.gov> <3B54DB55.4F633BDA@ieee.org> <m2y9pnm34i.fsf@pusch.xnet.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1141dc,f4dfcde22ee4c9c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid1141dc,public
X-Google-Thread: 104752,f4dfcde22ee4c9c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid104752,public
X-Google-Thread: 100065,f4dfcde22ee4c9c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid100065,public
X-Google-Thread: 106ae0,f4dfcde22ee4c9c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ae0,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-18 10:08:58 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-was.dfn.de!znr.news.ans.net!news.chips.ibm.com!newsfeed.btv.ibm.com!gazette.almaden.ibm.com!not-for-mail
From: Matt Carey <matt.carey@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.cond-matter,sci.materials,sci.mech.fluids,fj.sci.matter
Subject: Re: Neutrino Masses
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:05:32 -0700
Organization: IBM Almaden Research Center
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <3B55C1DC.E342796E@ieee.org>
References: <a786eec.0107151054.5e5c867b@posting.google.com> <3B51F2D9.CEB79A8B@hate.spam.net> <3B5390E4.6056173A@ieee.org> <3B54A1A6.BE529082@grc.nasa.gov> <3B54DB55.4F633BDA@ieee.org> <m2y9pnm34i.fsf@pusch.xnet.com>
Reply-To: matt.carey@ieee.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: carey1.almaden.ibm.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: gazette.almaden.ibm.com 995475745 19628 9.1.18.139 (18 Jul 2001 17:02:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: postmaster@almaden.ibm.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 17:02:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en