Article View: sci.physics.fusion
Article #1005Re: Fluid mechanics question.. how crude is the heat estimate?
From: Cameron Randale Bass
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 00:42
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 00:42
43 lines
2778 bytes
2778 bytes
In article <11DEC199218025457@zeus.tamu.edu> i0c0256@zeus.tamu.edu (IGOR) writes:
>
>I am kinda of puzzled by this cold fusion thing but I have an open mind
>about it. The question I have is a question from a fluid mechanics
>person and not that of a (nuclear) engineer :
>
>How can one so precisely determine the amount of heat generated?
>have they been fluid flow studies about this ? that is computer generated
>calculation proving that what the sensor gets is linked to a certain amount
>a heat on the cell side.
>I am working in two-phase flow ( I DO NOT use correlation) solving the
>Navier-Stokes equation and I know that even phase change problem
>(such as the one occuring in the boiling) is a bitch... how can people be
>so sure of the heat generated ? My reasoning comes from my total distrust
>of heat transfer coeficient used in nuclear engineering that are there
>to give an estimate and not a TRUE value ( since they are mainly used
>for design purposes)...
Energy balances are much easier than detailed flow calculations,
especially when you aren't venting to the atmosphere. A seemingly
good example of how to do so fairly accurately has been posted
by Tom Droege regularly (in various incarnations). Any more adverbs
in the previous sentence, and I'll have to barf on my own prose.
By the way, how do you do two-phase flow without correlations
or constitutive relations based on correlations?
Where do you get your computer? Mine won't go that fast.
People have difficulty computationally accounting for a single
bubble interface, to say nothing of the generic interspersed
turbulent two-phase flow.
If you do have some magic approach, please tell me soon. I'm finishing
a dissertation on boiling two-phase flow calculations in cryogens
using all sorts of averaging and jury-rigged constitutive relations.
A more elegant approach would sure be appreciated.
dale bass
--
C. R. Bass crb7q@virginia.edu
Department of Mechanical,
Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering
University of Virginia (804) 924-7926
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec12.004233.13433@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!spool.mu.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7qReferences:
<11DEC199218025457@zeus.tamu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!spool.mu.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7q From: crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion Subject: Re: Fluid mechanics question.. how crude is the heat estimate? Message-ID: <1992Dec12.004233.13433@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Date: 12 Dec 92 00:42:33 GMT References: <11DEC199218025457@zeus.tamu.edu> Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU Organization: University of Virginia Lines: 43