Article View: sci.physics.fusion
Article #1188Discretionary Spending
From: Jed Rothwell
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 04:31
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 04:31
71 lines
4816 bytes
4816 bytes
To: >INTERNET:fusion@zorch.sf-bay.org Rusty Perrin and J. A. Carr have questioned whether the DoE has any legal authority to conduct CF experiments in the first place, without authorization from Congress. This is a reasonable question. I have discussed it with Members of Congress and with officials in the DoE, and as I understand it, the rules are as follows: 1. The DoE has various discretionary funds, both at headquarters and at the individual research institutions, like LANL. These represent only a small fraction of the total DoE budget (I do not know what percent). In 1989, many CF experiments were performed using these funds. (Far too many, in my opinion.) 2. Congress does not micromanage on this level. The DoE could not perform CF experiments costing $100 million, but they certainly could perform scattered work amounting to a few hundred thousand, or even a few million, as long as each experiment did not exceed the authorized discretionary limit of the worker. 3. Dr. Walter Polansky, Director of the Division of Advanced Energy Projects, has told me and many other people that his Department does have the authority to fund CF work. He said that the 1989 DoE panel, headed by Huizenga, "was sympathetic towards modest support for carefully focussed and cooperative experiments within the present funding system. The Department of Energy accepted the report and its recommendations. We have been monitoring the cold fusion research area since the issuance of that report and believe its recommendations are still valid. We continue to be available to review any research proposal of interest to the Department." That's what the man says, but actually, as far as I can tell, Polansky is a hatchet man who goes around shutting down CF experiments, overriding other people's spending authority, and cutting everything including your telephone if you try anything related to CF. So, if you are thinking of submitting a proposal, I suggest you steer clear of the man. Under normal circumstances, if a scientist at LANL, Fermilab or some other DoE lab had some level of discretionary spending authority, and he or she wished to, he could conduct experiments relating to energy. As long as the experiments stayed within the allowed budget, there would be no problem. Certainly, if he could show that his Japanese colleagues were spending 10's of millions on the subject, nobody would object to a few simple replications of the Japanese work costing $10 or $20 thousand. Nothing about CF is normal, so these customs do not apply. "Discretionary" is a loose term, subject to definition and revision. There is no such thing as perfectly 100% discretionary money, in any institution. No DoE honcho would get away with funding a study of orgasmic energy sources. The closest thing I can think of to a real Discretionary Fund is the 5 million Yen Japanese professors get just for showing up at work: when I attended a National University, I took a nice day trip or two, and used a lot of "discretionary" video and computer equipment for purposes not directly related to the Department's work. Also, we had several pet chickens and a large turtle, whose sustenance came out that funding I believe. In most institutions, however, discretionary expenditures that get too far away from the subject would be reviewed and censured. Projects which are too wild and flakey, like ESP spoon bending energy in the DoE, or faith-healing at NIH would get anyone into trouble, which seems reasonable to me. Unfortunately, anything remotely related to CF falls in this category: too flakey and weird to be allowed. Research institution heads and other people with discretionary authorization have been explicitly ordered *not* to spend anymoney or allow any experiments in CF. The ostensible reason is that it is too far beyond the pale, too "pathological." This may, in fact, be one of the reasons it is banned, but I believe the main reason it that the people who are fighting against it know that if it succeeds, their reputations will go down in flames; and also because the hot fusion program, and many other energy programs, will be rapidly terminated. People engaged in a turf war find it easy to convince themselves that their opponents are flakes. - Jed
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<930126163947_72240.1256_EHL56-1@CompuServe.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!sgiblab!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!fusionShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!sgiblab!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!fusion From: Jed Rothwell <ub-gate.UB.com!compuserve.com!72240.1256> Subject: Discretionary Spending Message-ID: <930126163947_72240.1256_EHL56-1@CompuServe.COM> Sender: scott@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Scott Hazen Mueller) Reply-To: Jed Rothwell <ub-gate.UB.com!compuserve.com!72240.1256> Organization: Sci.physics.fusion/Mail Gateway Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 04:31:22 GMT Lines: 72