Article View: sci.physics.fusion
Article #1195The Other Side
From: ub-gate.UB.comfnald.fnal.govDROE...
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 04:32
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 04:32
13 lines
1086 bytes
1086 bytes
While I have just zapped Jed Rothwell's list of good experiments, let me point out that I don't find the negative experiments all that good either. If we assume that as McKubre says, that essential conditions are 1000+ running hours, and 200+ ma per sq cm, then almost all negative experiments are eliminated. If we add a need for Si or Al or B, then we may eliminate them all! Someone remind me of a negative experiment that achieved high D/Pd loading, ran for 1000+ hours, ran at 200+ ma, and had traces of Al, B, or Si? Oh yes, add 1% or better sensitivity or eonugh runs to get a hot one. So I think the jury is still out. Tom Droege
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<930126142922.208008fc@FNALD.FNAL.GOV>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!sgiblab!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!fusionShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!sgiblab!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!fusion From: ub-gate.UB.com!fnald.fnal.gov!DROEGE Subject: The Other Side Message-ID: <930126142922.208008fc@FNALD.FNAL.GOV> Sender: scott@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Scott Hazen Mueller) Reply-To: ub-gate.UB.com!fnald.fnal.gov!DROEGE Organization: Sci.physics.fusion/Mail Gateway Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 04:32:14 GMT Lines: 13