Article View: sci.physics.fusion
Article #1207Not your normal assignment
From: Jed Rothwell
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 02:39
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 02:39
38 lines
2629 bytes
2629 bytes
To: >INTERNET:fusion@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG Me: "Let me make your assignment crystal clear: prove the heat is an experimental error." Tom D: "That is not the way science works, Jed. Experiments are published with enough detail for replication." Yes. I know that. I am not giving out your normal, everyday scientific assignment here. Instead, I have in mind that someone should "debunk" cold fusion the way the American physicist R. W. Wood debunked "N-Rays" on September 29, 1904. Wood did not need to "replicate" the experiments (which was impossible, in any case). All he had to do was to show that the method of detecting and measuring the effect was bogus. CF is exactly the same. No "skeptic" needs to replicate anything, or perform any experiment in order to debunk it once and for all. You do not need to know anything about the cell construction; not a single detail. All you have to do is prove that calorimetry does not work. It is simple! For 200 years, we have been measuring heat by generating linear temperature calibration curves, and then running samples that generate unknown amounts of heat. We see how hot the calorimeter water gets, then by referring back to the calibration curve, we see how much heat was generated. Either this method works, or it does not. The so-called skeptics say that all excess heat results are invalid, therefore they are saying that this method does not work. They are asserting that heat does *not* raise water temperature in a linear, proportional manner; or they are asserting that thermometers do not measure temperature. These are very simple, very straightforward assertions, so they should be dead simple to prove. The issue is not what is in the "black box" cell, or what nuclear or unknown processes it is undergoing. The issue is far simpler than that: can we, or can we not, measure the heat that comes out of a cell? If we can, then the skeptics are utterly wrong and misguided, and the Japanese are entirely justified in spending money to enhance and commercialize the effect. - Jed
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<930127153020_72240.1256_EHL34-1@CompuServe.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!pacbell.com!tandem!UB.com!zorch!fusionShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!pacbell.com!tandem!UB.com!zorch!fusion From: Jed Rothwell <ub-gate.UB.com!compuserve.com!72240.1256> Subject: Not your normal assignment Message-ID: <930127153020_72240.1256_EHL34-1@CompuServe.COM> Sender: scott@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Scott Hazen Mueller) Reply-To: Jed Rothwell <ub-gate.UB.com!compuserve.com!72240.1256> Organization: Sci.physics.fusion/Mail Gateway Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 02:39:31 GMT Lines: 39