Article View: sci.physics.fusion
Article #1227Inconsistent Experiments
From: DROEGE
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 22:45
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 22:45
15 lines
951 bytes
951 bytes
While I agree with most of what Jon Webb says in reply to Jed Rothwell, when he says: -- it can't be the case that Mills & Farrell and Yamaguchi and Notoya and Pons and Fleischmann and McKubre are all right; they have inconsistent experiments." I don't think we know enough about what is happening to know that they are inconsistent. For example, they could all be wrong, and that would make them consistent! So Jon, how are they inconsistent? From my view, they could all be based on some common principal. Tom Droege
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<930106161158.20c082a7@FNALD.FNAL.GOV>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!fusionShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!fusion From: DROEGE@fnald.fnal.gov Subject: Inconsistent Experiments Message-ID: <930106161158.20c082a7@FNALD.FNAL.GOV> Sender: scott@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Scott Hazen Mueller) Reply-To: DROEGE@fnald.fnal.gov Organization: Sci.physics.fusion/Mail Gateway Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 22:45:14 GMT Lines: 15