🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.fusion
Article #1227

Inconsistent Experiments

#1227
From: DROEGE
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 22:45
15 lines
951 bytes
While I agree with most of what Jon Webb says in reply to Jed Rothwell, when
he says:

-- it can't be the case that Mills & Farrell and Yamaguchi and Notoya and
Pons and Fleischmann and McKubre are all right; they have inconsistent
experiments."

I don't think we know enough about what is happening to know that they are
inconsistent.  For example, they could all be wrong, and that would make 
them consistent!

So Jon, how are they inconsistent?  From my view, they could all be 
based on some common principal.  

Tom Droege
Technical Details
Message-ID: <930106161158.20c082a7@FNALD.FNAL.GOV>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!fusion

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!fusion
From: DROEGE@fnald.fnal.gov
Subject: Inconsistent Experiments
Message-ID: <930106161158.20c082a7@FNALD.FNAL.GOV>
Sender: scott@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Scott Hazen Mueller)
Reply-To: DROEGE@fnald.fnal.gov
Organization: Sci.physics.fusion/Mail Gateway
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 22:45:14 GMT
Lines: 15