🚀 go-pugleaf

Originally-From: blue@nscl01.nscl.msu.edu

<... quite a long posting, almost a JR unit... {:]  >

>I have one more question relating of fractofusion, bubbles, and
>non-equilibrium.  Suppose by hook or crook I do produce a transient
>electric field in the presence of some deuterons and some electrons.
>What keeps the electrons sitting still while the deuterons accelerate
>to velocities high enough to induce fusion?  I have always be taught
>that a mass ratio of roughly 4000:1 would leave the deuterons sitting
>still while the electrons rushed off to cancel the field.  Of course
>that is old fashioned theory.

Having said all that stuff in my last posting about words, I nevertheless
reckon this is brilliant, and I wish I had thought of it! Fractofusion
demolished in a sentence, it seems. Just like Frank Close's demolition of
Bockris's dendrite theory, in one brilliant sentence. I would like to be able
to refer to this, Dick - but the NEWS net is not a "real" reference. How about
dressing this up as a note to some journal? Nature might even take it as a
Letter, they have published a fracto-related paper. Wouldn't take you too long
to write a short Letter, would it? Come on, Dick.

How about it, you solid state experts out there? Is there any reason for this
to be wrong? Is there something to make electrons stick tighter to the lattice
than deuterons, i.e. harder to eject across a crack? I'd say not, look at
vacuum tubes (there are some of us, Tom, who remember them). How come
everybody writing about fractofusion has overlooked this? Prof. Jones, does
this not also apply to piezofusion, or is that an entirely different effect? I
must look up that paper to refresh my memory.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dieter Britz alias britz@kemi.aau.dk
Kemisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------