🚀 go-pugleaf

<logajan@ns.network.com (John Logajan)> quotes and writes:

>J_FARRELL@acad.fandm.edu writes:
>>As far as we can tell they [hydrinoes] do not represent a biological hazard.
>
>This can only be true, I would think, if they were essentially chemically
>inert below temperatures hostile to lifeforms.  Much of biological chemistry
>involves the structures of molecules, and the size of the constituent
>atoms has a strong influence on such structural alignment.  Thus a smaller
>hydrogen atom would certainly muck up biological chemistry if it had similar
>chemical properties to its larger cousin.

When Mills and I were first considering the possiblility of the hydrino
causing harmful biological effects, were we going on the assumption that
it was a highly reactive species and would thus not participate in
catalytic effects.  Then Mills changed his mind, and said that any
hydrinos would be inert.  I'm not sure why he changed his mind.  Perhaps
Dr. Farrell has an explanation as to why they would be inert rather than
highly reactive.


Sincerely,

Steve Kneizys
Ursinus College