Article View: sci.physics.fusion
Article #1288Re: What are wise investments if one thinks energy will get cheaper?
From: Arnie Frisch
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 17:09
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 17:09
48 lines
2524 bytes
2524 bytes
In article <C0o7Ay.HEB@cs.uiuc.edu> watanabe@cs.uiuc.edu (Larry Watanabe) writes: >rburns@key.COM (Randy Burns) writes: > >>The more I read the news in sci.physics.fusion, the more that I tend >>to think that _somebody_(my own favorite horses in this race are some >>of the small companies working on hot fusion) will come up with a >>dramatically improved energy source sometime in the next 30 years. > >>What investment strategies can folks suggest that would benefit >>from events that dramatically decrease the costs of energy. ........... >>I'd expect oil and coal prices to both drop rather dramatically after >>some breakthrough in energy technology unless the non-energy uses of oil >>(i.e. making plastics and fabrics) expanded dramatically in response to >>cheaper energy prices. This just doesn't hold water. In many of the oil producing areas of the world - especially, the US and the North Sea, the cost of production is high enough that a precipitous drop in consumption would just take these produccers off line. The market would probably stabilize at about $15 per barrel. >For example, you might invest in Japanese companies, >since Japan must import a lot of oil from the Middle East. >If Japan could have its own independent energy, that would >make it much less vulnerable, increasing the economic >viability and security of the country. Japan seems to be making major investments in a strategy that would make their energy Plutonium based. Short term, this could give them great advantages because there's a lot of excess PU, and it's comparatively cheap. But long-term, when cheap alternative energy becomes available, the Japanese will suffer the costs of cleaning up their nuclear trash, while the rest of the world laughs at them. If you don't believe this can happen, look at the Trojan nuclear plant in Oregon; planned for 40 years of operation and clean-up costs of about $20 million, it closed after 17 years with projected cleanup costs around $550 million. Arnold Frisch Tektronix Laboratories
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<13183@sail.LABS.TEK.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.tek.com!sail!arniefReferences:
<3959@key.COM> <C0o7Ay.HEB@cs.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.tek.com!sail!arnief From: arnief@sail.LABS.TEK.COM (Arnie Frisch) Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion,misc.invest Subject: Re: What are wise investments if one thinks energy will get cheaper? Message-ID: <13183@sail.LABS.TEK.COM> Date: 11 Jan 93 17:09:56 GMT References: <3959@key.COM> <C0o7Ay.HEB@cs.uiuc.edu> Followup-To: sci.physics.fusion Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR. Lines: 48