🚀 go-pugleaf

Originally-From: <STEVO%URSINUS.BITNET@vm1.nodak.edu>:

>When Mills and I were first considering the possiblility of the hydrino
>causing harmful biological effects, were we going on the assumption that
>it was a highly reactive species and would thus not participate in
>catalytic effects.  Then Mills changed his mind, and said that any
>hydrinos would be inert.  I'm not sure why he changed his mind.  Perhaps
>Dr. Farrell has an explanation as to why they would be inert rather than
>highly reactive.

I can offer an explanation, in terms of the Mills theory (which I don't
believe):
The Mills theory explains the excess heat as coming mainly from hydrogen atoms
falling to a lower energy state, one of the 1/N states. For this to work, the
resulting hydrinos would have to remain as such indefinitely, otherwise you'd
reabsorb the heat, and no excess. This would explain why Mills does not
believe in a biological hazard. For the hydrino to do something chemical, it
would have to get back up to a normal state, or be ionised.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dieter Britz alias britz@kemi.aau.dk
Kemisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------