Article View: sci.physics.fusion
Article #1295Lost in the mail?
From: Jed Rothwell
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 17:44
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 17:44
27 lines
1644 bytes
1644 bytes
To: >INTERNET:fusion@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG Frank Close says: "You posted, on behalf of Gene Mallove your colleague, a statement in early 1992 claiming that I had deliberately ignored in Too Hot To Handle important positive data on neutrons that would have damaged my thesis, and that had been sent to me by Dr. Worledge of EPRI prior to my book. This is utterly false, as anyone can confirm by calling Worledge." I called Dave Worledge last week, but he was not there. He must be out of town. He told Gene he sent a lot stuff to you. Maybe it got lost in the mail. Why don't you call him and ask for another copy? I gather that part of it described the work of Howard Menlove, of Los Alamos. Menlove did not make it into the index of THTH. Perhaps the material was lost in the mail, but that is not really the issue. The issue is that you very deliberately ignore things. Even now, you are deliberately ignoring everything we know about chemistry, calorimetry, thermodynamics, conservation of energy, the scientific method, and the roles of experimental evidence versus theory. - Jed Distribution: >INTERNET:fusion@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<930110201809_72240.1256_EHL45-1@CompuServe.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!fusionShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!fusion From: Jed Rothwell <72240.1256@compuserve.com> Subject: Lost in the mail? Message-ID: <930110201809_72240.1256_EHL45-1@CompuServe.COM> Sender: scott@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Scott Hazen Mueller) Reply-To: Jed Rothwell <72240.1256@compuserve.com> Organization: Sci.physics.fusion/Mail Gateway Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 17:44:30 GMT Lines: 28