Article View: sci.physics.fusion
Article #1302irradiated
From: mitchell swartz
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 23:06
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 23:06
26 lines
1082 bytes
1082 bytes
In article sci.physics.fusion:4845, Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993
Tom Droege (DROEGE@fnald.fnal.gov) writes:
>> "Almost any source could be used for test, but a little
>> patience would give a cosmic ray. I would not worry too
>> much about getting radiated until I saw a track or two.
It is respectfully noted that ought be "irradiated".
The electrode might radiate (or it might not),
but if it did, and Tom Droege was in the incident beam,
then he would be irradiated.
== "radiated -- to send out rays, shine brightly"
== "irradiated -- to cast rays of light upon,
to affect or treat by radiant energy"
[after Webster (ibid)]
One should not work so long or so hard as to confuse
one's self and the experiment. Unless...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C0ppJ1.72K@world.std.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!world!micaShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!world!mica From: mica@world.std.com (mitchell swartz) Subject: irradiated Message-ID: <C0ppJ1.72K@world.std.com> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 23:06:36 GMT Lines: 29