🚀 go-pugleaf

$$             Coup-GR-Tivity (after Einstein died):
$$  Coup-Ph.T scored BiG-time ..changing the "mass" definition.
    Then calling EVERYbody stupid for saying h*f/c^2 is "mass".
    [Ever SiNCE having CLAiMED the iNTELLECTUAL HiGHER ground].
    Of course, no OTHER dicipline was THAT adamant, about mass.
    [ALMOST worked.!! Ph.T ALMOST changed the EiNSTEiN "mass"]. 

$$                        Einstein's LAW:
    Any iNTRiNSiC REST energy e / c^2 = EQUiVALENT REST "mass".

$$  A good PRE-coup-Ph.T (after Einstein died) ANALYSiS, Harry.

$$  Hope this helps,                                  ```Brian.

hhc314@yahoo.com wrote: > > Tom posted: > 
> "None of that addresses the fact that we can't design buildings to
> sustain any sort of impact and/or explosion."
>
> Tom, history has demonstrated that we both can and have constructed
> large buildings that have demonstrated an ability to withstand such
> threats -- The problem actually is that today no one wants to pay the
> cost for this quality of construction or to accept the associated open
> floor space constraints/limitations.
> Disasters like the WTC are in my mind the result of weak spined
> structural engineers allowing real estate firms to dictate building
> design and priorities that, in this case, focused on unobstructed, open
> floor space, uniform building cross section, and the use of
> inexpensive, balloon style construction with its implicit domino
> failure mode.
>
> Had the buildings not been destroyed by terrorist jets, given enough
> time an office fire on any one of the upper floors would eventually
> have led to an identical outcome (but hopefully with fewer lives lost).
> WTC is, sadly, just another engineering disaster to add to the list.
>
> Note that in spite of many fires, airplane collisions, and bombs, all
> of the great skyscrapers built prior to 1950 are still standing.  It is
> interesting to note that virtually none of these represent a uniform
> building cross section nor shell supported, balloon construction
> technology. Evidently buildings of this calibre are simply too time
> consuming and costly to construct today, or simply that insurance is
> cheaper than quality engineering and construction.
>
> Just my thoughts on the subject.
>
> Kindest regards,  Harry C.
Re: Bad Joints Caused Pancake Collapse of WTC
Re: Coup-GR-Tivity (after Einstein died).