🚀 go-pugleaf

$$ MOMENTUM UNcertainty varies iNVERSELY with the PATH STRAiGHTNESS.
Tao wrote: >> "FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > | On the one hand with special relativity Einstein got rid of
> > | the aether - the medium which electromagnetic waves use to
> > | travel and which can be used as an absolute reference system.
 -=-
> > Einstein did not "get rid of" the fundamental medium.  He just
> > showed it was not necessary to include it for *most* physics.
> > -=- SNiP -=- FrediFizzx > > http://www.vacuum-physics.com > >
>
> I think the key change of viewpoint was that the aether looked
> the same regardless of what speed you were moving, distinguishing
> it from any material.

$$      Constant AMBiENT particle COUNT; Constant VELOCiTY c/n:
$$   AMBiENT media (including Einstein's "light medium") REGULATEs
$$   the light VELOCiTY v to be CONSTANT @ CONSTANT particle COUNT.
$$
$$ VELOCiTY is a VECTOR over DURATiON; SPEED, the PATH over DURATiON":

        o o                         o  o
             X                   o        Q      vector
               o                o           o  projection
                A - - - VELOCiTY vector - -> B - - - - -> C
                 o            o               o
                   P        o                   Y
                      o  o                          o  o
                    ANY path.

$$    Any VELOCiTY vector can ONLY be "MEASURED" ..in RETROSPECT.
$$ [Vector VELOCiTY, (A->B)/t, is iNDEPENDANT of path SPEED, (A~B)/t].
$$ NOTE: Any other *iMAGiNARY* velocity, BETWEEN any OTHER TWO points
$$ (each located on the SAME path) will indicate a DiFFERENT velocity
$$ vector, albeit (even though) THAT SAME *path* clearly doN'T CHANGE.
$$ [i.e. Note, VELOCiTiEs X->Y and P->Q are vectors on the SAME PATH].
$$
$$ Momentum UNcertainty varies iNVERSELY with the PATH's STRAiGHTNESS.
$$
$$ Physically speaking,         ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).
$$
[p.s. DECLARiNG "No PRiOR geometry" GR *cut off* it's own WORLD-line].

Re: Any SPACE-time where STUFF is CLEARLY isN'T EMPTY.!!
Re: "Physical EMPTiNESS ..iN between POiNTs"; Fischy (2005).
Re: "The PHYSiCs of EMPTiNESS ..OUTside of POiNTs"; Fischy (2006).
Re: Is the quantum field an aether?   Re: Vectors caN'T be *MEASURED*.