🚀 go-pugleaf

Tom [He between his error-bars] Roberts wrote: > > sal wrote:
> >           "Geometry" is a mathematical model, sure. -=-

$$            Observing SiMULTANEiTY together, at ONCE.
$$  REAL mumber ARiTHMETiC is a *simultaneously* geometrical MODEL.
$$  [i.e. All sides of REGULAR polygons are EQUAL-at-ONCE-in-TiME].
$$  [i.e. This, PROPOSED because we need COHERENT standard VOLUME].
 
> Yes.
> > -=-  talking about what appears to be "the geometry of NATURE".
>
>         Hmmm. I have no idea how Nature _really_ works.
>         I do know of various _models_ of Nature that are
>         excellent descriptions of physical phenomena in
>         the world we inhabit, valid in certain domains. -=- -=-

$$ You let "Nature" be your synonym of "physical phenomena, Dimwit.

>        In particular, I would be quite surprised if Nature
>        actually has any sort of geometry in Her methods; I
>        consider geometry to be a _model_, not any sort of
>        "reality".

$$ Geometry is the 3-d MODEL for ARiTHMETiCAL standards of REALiTY.

>    And I consider those people who claim to know how Nature
>        really works to be fools of the highest order....

$$ Emmy NOEther NEVER EVER mentioned an "inherent centro-symmetry".
$$ Heinz Pagels NEVER EVER mentioned an "inherent centro-symmetry".

> Tom [He between his error-bars] Roberts     tjroberts@lucent.com
Re: FAQ - (the heretic's version)
Re: REAL-number GEOMETRY.