🚀 go-pugleaf

$$ Because My "iN-TRANSiT" light is My propagating medium:
$                         ^
$$                    GRavitons:
$                 PhoTon = GRaviton;
$             GRaviton = IAMbient phoNon.
$        PhoTons are SiMPLY "IAMbient" phoNons.
$  While phoTons apply OUTside; PhoNons apply iNside.
 PhoTons & phoNons are ARiTHMETiCALLY indistinguishable.
 PhoTons & phoNons are MATHEMATiCALLY indistinguishable.
 Photons are LONGiTUDiNALLY polarized, looking UPstream.
[The iNTERFACE: DiSTiNCTiON ..between a phoNon & phoTon.]
[IAM TRUTH, LiFE, and THE WAY; And GRACE, GRACE unto IT.]

                          Brian A M Stuckless
  >><> >><> >><> >><> >><>       ^.

Sue... wrote: > > Sue... wrote: > > Ken S. Tucker wrote:
> > > Gravitons => Photons
> > > We'll suggest gravitons convert to photons.
 -=-
> Note that induced dipoles are coherrent (because they
> are tracking each others phase) even tho they appear
> temporally random.  Permanent dipoles (atoms) *may*
> be incoherrent because their Q (stubborness) keeps them
> from phase locking at long ranges, even tho thay appear
> temporally periodic.
> 
> A dancing couple that follows each others moves can
> can get close. Attraction.
> Two indivduals, each doing their own thing, even in
> perfect synchrony with the music, will slap
> each other around the dance floor. Repulsion

$      Pioneer 10 path's ambient density gradient analogy:
Suppose the floor's tilted, just a little ..away from observers.!!
Daniel Weston's CONSTANCY-of-the-VELOCiTY-of-MiCE reference below.

                          ```Brian.
> Sue...
Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
Re: GRavitons=>PhoNons=>PhoTons.!!

$$       The CONSTANCY-of-the-VELOCiTY-of-MiCE & Light.
$ Yes Daniel, an EXCELLENT ANALOGY of the "PEGGED" VELOCiTY c.!!
  For the Pioneer anomaly, you TiLT the floor ..just a little.!!
  [Just enough to cause a SMALL increase in the mouse-velocity].
  This will help you SiMULATE the AMBiENT GRADiENT of DENSiTY.!!
  [There's an AMBiENT DENSiTY GRADiENT between EARth & Pioneer].

$ You can ELiMiNATE your GOLF-cart scenario, altogether, Daniel.
  NOW you drop the mouse ("PEGGED" at 3 mph), at the START LiNE.
  [Of course, the mouse will "actually" accelerate, DOWN-grade].
  [Of course, the mouse ACCELERATEs, _AWAY FROM_ the OBSERVERs].

$ But, the OBSERVERs have DECLARED the 3 mph to be a CONSTANT.!!
  [ Having DECLARED the "CONSTANCY-of-the-VELOCiTY-of-MiCE".!! ]

So, ALL the GR OBSERVERs must agree (..especially Ph.Tivitists):

1. The VELOCiTY of the MOUSE has NOT been ALTERED in the TEST.!!
The mouse's velocity, in fact, REMAiNED _iNCREDiBLY_ CONSTANT.!!
[And, has _REMAiNED_ iNCREDiBLY CONSTANT, since the BiG BANG].!!

2. SCiENTiST measure _ABSOLUTELY_ NO TiLT in gym floor at all.!!
[i.e. SCiENTiSTs CONFiRM there is NO SLOPE DiSTANCE to MEASURE].

Note, HORiZONTAL DiSTANCE times 3 mph = SLOPE DiSTANCE times X.

CONCLUSiON: This is _VERY MUCH_ ..._QUiTE like_ the PiONEER ANOMALY.!!
Yeah. Yeah, VERiLY, VERiLY, i re-reiterate NOW so ye will know THEN.!!
My GUESS iSS "iN-TRANSiT" light SPACE ..the propagating medium COME.!!
My GUESS iSS "iN-TRANSiT" light the propagating SPACE medium COMiNG.!!

$$ Go-go Google GROUP SEARCH < My BiGGER bang.!! > dooOPs.!! ```Brian.

CLOSE:                     Brian A M Stuckless           ..over & OUT.
                                  ^
GUESS (RESTmass)*c^4=(iNTRiNSiC energy e)*c^2=(mol part)*K*Volt*meter.
                        My GUESS iSS STANDARD
                      <   The STANDARD set.   >
                     /\
                __  _\/_  __
                \_\/_/\_\/_/ 
                  /\_\/_/\               ("`-/")_.-'"``-._
                 _\/_/\_\/_               \. . `; -._    )-;-, `)
                /_/\_\/_/\_\     \ /       (v_,)  _  )`-.\  ``-'
                     /\         - O -   _ .- _..-_/ / ((.'
                     \/          / \  ((,.-'    ((,/ By: Toe.!
$$                 By deeds you know them.!! >><> >><> >><> >><> >><>
BEHOLD, IAM THAT IAM hath circumcised the FORESKiNs of your hearts.!!
$$        :-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'`
$                  ____    _                   _          _   _
$                 |  _ \  | |   ___    _ __   | | __     | | | |
$                 | |_) | | |  / _ \  | '_ \  | |/ /     | | | |
$  My _ENORMOUS_  |  __/  | | | (_) | | | | | |   <   _  |_| |_|
$                 |_|     |_|  \___/  |_| |_| |_|\_\ (_) (_) (_)
$
$$        :*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_
BEHOLD, IAM THAT IAM WHOLLY WHOLLY WHOLLY He ..and no more is more.!!

Daniel Weston wrote: > 
> There is this sticky problem in SR of the SOL being constant wrt
> the observer, and independent of the speed of the emitter.  After
> some reflection I came up with the following:
>
> I recently bought for my grandson a mechanical mouse that runs
> by a motor that is battery powered.  It is remotely controllable,
> but let that be irrelevant hereafter.
>
> As a gedankin do the following:  Take the mouse to a large gym
> together with a golf cart.  Set up the mouse to go in a straight
> line.  On the east end of the gym are scientists that will be
> measuring the speed of the mouse as it goes over a 10 ft measured
> course.
>
> On the far west end of the gym, get into the golf cart, turn on
> the motor of the mouse  and while traveling toward the east end,
> hang over the side and drop the mouse 1/4 inch to the floor.
>  Repeat the same with the golf cart going away from scientists
> at the east end.  And finally drop the mouse to the floor, with
> the cart stationary.
>
> In each case the scientists measured the speed of the mouse as
> 3 mph.
> IOW, the measured speed of the mouse was independent of the
> speed of its golf cart source.  In each case the mouse attained
> its regular speed after some "screeching of its tires".  The
> speed measured was always its own self generated speed.
>
> Question:  From the standpoint of theoretical physics, does the
> preceding analogy have any possible connection to the constancy
> of the SOL irrespective of the speed of its source.
Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL.

George Dishman wrote: > > "Rob Dekker" <rob@verific.com> wrote
> > Finally, drag by dust, hydrogen, or superconducting space fabric
> > all seem 'drag force' theories to explain the Pioneer anomaly.
 -=-
> > (Interestingly, I do not find any drag-force theory analysis in
> > the Pioneer Anomaly report
> > http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0104064)
 -=-
> HTH >
> George
Re: Pioneer Anomaly Was :Can a black hole feed more than once?!.
Re: iN-TRANSiT light is a propagating medium.