🚀 go-pugleaf

$     IAM THAT iAMBiA Him-in-it He-der THEORY (He-ALL-der):
"Sources" AND "emf" MAKE UP interSTELLAR MEDiA, dooOPs.!! NO void.!!
Avagadro's LAW is *PROOF* of an interFACE BETWEEN molar particles.!!
OTHERwise, ALL objects COMMONLY made manifest to us such as ROCKs or
interSTELLAR DUST would COLLAPSE to pointLiKE mass NEAR ZERO Kelvin.

ALL GUESS iSS (n - 1) CODATA mass is SUBMERGED in THAT iAMBiA MEDiA.

$               RED-and-BLUE-shifted RAW DATA
There is ONLY ONE painfully OBViOUS answer.!!
One would have to KNOW EXACT the VARiOUS pathWAY particle COUNTs.!!
The apparently RED-or-BLUE-shifted RAW DATA is due to *PEGGED* c.!!
RED & BLUE shift GOEs if one KNOWs the *ACTUAL AVERAGE* velocity.!!
For the PiONEER ANOMALY disappears with RAW DATA corrected for c.!!
[ A pathWAY THROUGH a STELLAR ambient GRADiENT, however, is easy. ]
[ A pathWAY THROUGH UNknown interSTELLAR ambient is, NOT so easy. ]
[ A pathWAY THROUGH UNknown interGALACTiCA ambient is, Ph.Tivity. ]
[ A pathWAY THROUGH UNknown interUNiVERSAl ambient is, Ph.Tivity. ]

                             brian a m stuckless
     >><> >><> >><> >><> >><> 

rotchm@gmail.com wrote:
> The universe is as it was and will be. Stars & galaxies etc explode,
> reform etc. Gravity attracts many of these objects together, some
> collide etc. The objects move wrt each other, some pass by and some
> collide. This cosmic brew indefinitely continues on.... Thats is what
> you call your "static" universe. Sources of EM waves far away from us
> travel through the interstellar void, --

 insert ..see top of PAGE.!!

> -- hitting and being absorbed by
> some debries (objects) hence further reducing their observed intensity.

> Now I am trying to understand how this scenario produces redshift... Of
> course some photons are absorbed by interstellar matter hence we count
> less photons per unit time, but the ones that do make it to us still
> have their initial frequency (energy)...? --

 insert ..see top of PAGE.!!

> --  Something I am missing  here...Care to elaborate or to explain
> further?
Re: He-der THEORY (He-ALL-der) with RED-and-BLUE-shifted RAW DATA.!!