Article View: sci.physics.fusion
Article #1406Re: SiR CRANK-a-LOT
From: ProfMingle
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:52
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:52
6 lines
1505 bytes
1505 bytes
And what about the heisenberg uncertainty principle? Does that not exist either? Or perhaps, it may have been in existence. You obviously changed the outcome by measuring it. Maybe we can do the same to you. ;)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1132318360.177860.280570@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<43759E41.6DFD@nf.sympatico.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10830a,6c0f044de7d155f0 X-Google-Thread: 1025ed,6c0f044de7d155f0 X-Google-Thread: fa84d,6c0f044de7d155f0 X-Google-Attributes: gid10830a,gid1025ed,gidfa84d,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: ProfMingle@gmail.com Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion,bit.listserv.geodesic,sci.edu Subject: Re: SiR CRANK-a-LOT Date: 18 Nov 2005 04:52:40 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 7 Message-ID: <1132318360.177860.280570@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <43759E41.6DFD@nf.sympatico.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.219.8.119 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1132318365 23840 127.0.0.1 (18 Nov 2005 12:52:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:52:45 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <43759E41.6DFD@nf.sympatico.ca> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: 1.0 MORDOR Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=212.219.8.119; posting-account=FJi3dg0AAABFkdURrFqatTDJWJ_eh_-V