🚀 go-pugleaf

Frame-of-Reference ..SPEED versus VELOCiTY:
VELOCiTY vector A->B straight from POSiTiON A to B, as shown;
o o                         o  o
     o                   o        o       vector
       o                o           o   PROjECTiON
        A -VELOCiTY (ruler) vector-> B - - - - - -> C
         o            o               o
           o        o                   o
              o  o                         o o
A train-TRACK, or, ANY PATH ( SPEED is ..ANY PATH / TiME ).!!

[Note, ANY OTHER two POiNTs on SAME PATH a DiFFERENT VECTOR.]
[ CLEARLY the POSiTiON B is an ARBiTRARY point on the PATH. ]
[ SPEED is ANY PATH/duration; VELOCiTY the VECTOR/duration. ]

EXHiBiT a VELOCiTY c & a SPEED c "as-MEASURED Least-Squares"!

$  DoooOP DOooOP De dooOP De dooOP De dooOP De dooOP De.!! $
CALL.!! CALL iMMEDiATELY.!! iMMEDiATELY.!!, if you happen to: 
 ..fix any HUP or GR POiNT A closer than PLANCK length, lp.!!

A.                     PLANCK UNcertainty
[ i CANNOT locate POSiTiON A ..to within (+) or (-) lp / 2. ]
[ i CANNOT measure POSiTiON A closer than lp = hbar / Mp*c. ]
[ This applies iNHERENTLY for "EXACT position of ANY ball." ]
*You CANNOT ((focus)) POSiTiON A closer than PLANCK LENGTH.!!

THEREfore, Heisenberg's UN-necessary UNcertainty's REDUNDANT.

B.       Heisenberg's UNnecessary UNcertainty Principle
[ HEiSENBERG UNcertainty's ALL about HOW dimwits ((focus)). ]
[i CANNOT ((focus)) on BOTH ENDs of VELOCiTY vector AT ONCE.]

Heisenberg was NOT WRONG ..just because he GOT CAUGHT too OFTEN,
"Trying to ((focus)) on BOTH ENDs of VELOCiTY vectors, at once!"
                                          brian a m stuckless
  >><> >><> >><> >><> >><>