🚀 go-pugleaf

$       Feynmann's *virtual particle* NEGATiVE-COUNTs, duh.!!
AMBiENT MEDiA does NOT require "virtual particle" *NEGATiVE-COUNTs*.!!
A *Zero-AVERAGE* of particle-COUNTs requires *some-NEGATiVE COUNTs*.!!
                                      brian a m stuckless
  >><> >><> >><> >><> >><>
Steehs wrote: > "Do Virtual Photons Exist?" > 
>      The Aether was original conceived as a means of explaining
> "forces acting at a distance" (i.e.- electric, magnetic,
> gravitation, et al). When the idea of the classical Aether was
> abandoned early in the century, there was a need to find another
> means of explaining these forces because, if it were not possible
> to explain them by some other means then it would be necessary to
> retain the Aether and the absolute reference frame it represented.
> The elimination of that reference frame was an absolute imperative
> of the political agenda of the academic community.
> Fortunately, the advent of quantum theory allowed Dr. Feynmann to
> generate the idea that these forces were produced by the exchange
> of "virtual particles". These particles were so named because they
> popped into and out of existence for periods of time that were so
> short that the rules of quantum physics insured that their temporary
> existence did not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.
> 
>      It is easy to understand how these particles could provide a
> force over a distance. A "virtual particle" emitted from one point
> would absorb momentum and travel ballistically to another where it
> would release that momentum. The net result would be force acting
> between the points.
>
> The situation is analogous to the effect observed when two athletes
> throw a medicine ball back and forth to each other. Difficulty with
> the analogy is that the throwing of the medicine ball can only
> produce a repulsive force; it cannot produce an attractive force!
> The mathematics associated with the force production by "virtual
> particles" particles, however, does allow for the production of
> attractive forces, but, since no explanation as to how this is
> possible is provided, one is left with the suspicion that this is
> another example of a solution where an effect that is allowed by
> the mathematics involved is being used outside of the constraints
> imposed by the physical realities of the problem. These realities
> require a rather unusual exchange of momentum to be involved. In
> order to produce the attractive force, the "virtual photon" would
> have to be launched with a momentum represented by a propagation
> direction away from its target, reverse its momentum (direction of
> travel), go past its target and repeat the process so as to acquire
> a momentum in the required direction as it struck the target from
> behind. (If anyone can provide a different explanation I would like
> to hear it.)
> Of course, if the "virtual photon" were > propagating through a
> medium, such as the Aether, there would be no conceptual problem,
> the "virtual particle could make the necessary exchange of momentum
> with the medium. (A boomerang returns to the thrower because it
> changes momentum with a medium, air. But then, if the Aether were
> present we would have no need to consider the existence of "virtual
> photons".
> 
>      There is no need to resort to theoretical arguments, however.
> If virtual photons produce electric and magnetic forces, they
> should be observable. Consider a large electromagnet, such as is
> used in an MIR machine. A recent news report described an
> unfortunate incident where a steel oxygen bottle was not properly
> mounted to its wall bracket. The magnetic field of the MIR pulled
> the bottle to the machine and killed a boy who was being scanned.
> It is obvious that the room was filled with a large and extremely
> powerful magnetic field. If "virtual photons" were present in that
> room, they would have produced a level of electromagnetic
> interference that would scream their presence. If electric and
> magnetic forces were produced by "virtual photons", they would
> have to also effect any electromagnetic detectors in their
> vicinity and one would expect that both natural and man-made
> electric and magnetic fields would render electromagnetic
> communication impossible.
>
>    An experiment is described in Chapter 4 of "The Einstein Hoax"
> in which a strong electric field is produced inside of an
> evacuated chamber and an antenna is located between the electrodes.
> Using a radiation detector that covers the entire spectrum would
> allow the detection of any spurious photons that acted to produce
> the attractive force. Its a simple experiment and is one which
> should be performed it science is to accept "virtual photons" as
> meaningful.
>
>      The source material for this posting may be found in
> http://einsteinhoax/hoax.htm ("The Einstein Hoax" {1997});
> http://einsteinhoax/gravity.htm; ("Gravity" {1987}); and
> http://einsteinhoax/relcor.htm ("Corrections to Special
> Relativity" {1997}).
> EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH
> EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT
> WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE.
> PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD
> IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM THOSE IT
> HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
> 
>      All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at
> http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.
> 
>      Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not
> monitored on a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated
> with the same courtesy as they are presented. To prevent the
> wastage of time on both of our parts, please do not raise
> objections that are not related to material that you have read at
> the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
>
>      E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com
>
>      The material at the Website has been posted continuously for
> over 5 years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS
> OF ANY OF THE MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving
> arguments by individuals who have mindlessly accepted the
> prevailing wisdom without questioning it. If anyone provides a
> significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered, the
> material at the Website will be withdrawn. Challenges to date have
> revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one exception for
> which a correction was provided.
Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
Re: Feynmann's *virtual particle* NEGATiVE-COUNTs, duh.!!
AMBiENT MEDiA does NOT require "virtual particle" *NEGATiVE-COUNTs*.!!