🚀 go-pugleaf

[GUESS.wpd]; The REAL ARiTHMETiC of EVERYthing (AoE)!! ..no typos.
All the most Fundamental Physical Constants are also very much
Fundamental Mathematical Constants. These form a whole coherent
web of equations. Standard INTERNATiONAL CODATA symbols, equations
and nomenclature apply (in general SI units) in the "Arithmetic of
Everything" (the AOE) analysis. [See {iSS}.wpd; 59KB ..by request.]

These are the magnitudes we -ought- to arrive at by Least Squares
adjustment of all our experimentally measured magnitudes of these
Fundamental Physical Constants ..just as STANDARD pi is the simple
magnitude we -ought- arrive at, if we EVER did a Least Squares
adjustment of all of our experimentally as-measured magnitudes of
"circumference / diameter ratios" of many supected circles ..or the
"(circumference)'2 / surface area ratios" of suspected spheres.!!

The old SI CODATA (GiORGi) system is thereby completed and the
iNTEGRATED STANDARD System {the iSS} is NOW, finally, established.

The iNTEGRATED STANDARD System {iSS} now serves as a completely
and fully integrated, COHERENT translation of the mathematically
symbolic language of a natural Fundamental Unit STANDARD System.
All SI equations work exactly the same (and more) in the {iSS}.!!

In other words, the {iSS} MATHEMATiCAL MODEL is a SYSTEM of the
iDEAL fundamental iNTEGRATED STANDARD System [meter, kg, sec, Amp,
Mol, (mol-part) and degK] "units of measure",
 ..where:
               (mol part)*degK*sec -> Amp*meter.

Only grade-school level math is required (..including addition,
subtraction, multiplication, division, roots & exponents, a little
trigonometry and the general scientific standard units of measure).

Complex math had been required over the centuries to originally
derive the "APPROXiMATE" magnitudes of some of the OLD Fundamental
Physical Constants. There is no doubt NOW about the "APPROXiMATE"
experimental CODATA MAGNiTUDEs of Fundamental Physical Constants.
For example, deriving the APPROXiMATE experimental MAGNiTUDE of k,
or electron mass required very complex analysis and Least Squares
adjustment of the MEASURED data ..even calculus, and so on. That's
‘NOW' all done and is "inherently" included in each {iSS} Constant.
But any [GUESS] {iSS} PERiODiC TABLE mass is EXACT to ten figures.

We NOW know these constants are all simple composites of pi & "e".

Note the old SI CODATA 'Magnetic Permeability', pi & "e" Constants
are NOT "measured" experimental Constants ..each one had assigned
to it a "REAL number" MATHEMATiCAL Constant. Note ..for example,
that the Magnetic Permeability of vacuum constant Uo = 4*pi / 10^7.

Pi, (pi + 1), integer powers of 10 & "e" and the Stefan Boltzmann
Constant of Radiation Qx (another structured composite of 10 & "e"
form a co-ordinate matrix which "spits out" all of the Fundamental
Physical Constants such that all the fundamental SI equations still
apply ..as per CODATA. [Avagadro's Number Constant is given below.]

The Fundamental Units, Magnitudes & Equations are mathematically
defined. There are NO arbitrary Fundamental Physical Constants.!!

Fundamental Units for people; NOT people for fundamental units.!!

Brian Ellis, in 'Basic Concepts of Measurement', briefly mentions
a proposed much-improved System of Units of measure ..based on a
system of "classes of similar scales". Stuckless has achieved it.
The Molar System provides the ultimate scaling system with which
to MATHEMATiCALLY emulate and assimilate the Fundamental Physical
Constants, Units and the Periodic Table.  The author has succeded
in deriving the MATHEMATiCAL 'Atomic mass Unit' and has already
included the relevant mathematically-built fundamental particles
and some molecules (and seemingly ALL the isototes) in the thesis
nomenclature and equations file {iSS}.Wpd ..as mentioned above.

"Mathematical", here, means standard basic arithmetic ..including
addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, roots, exponents
 ..and all in terms of the Standard Units of Measurement.

AVAGADRO's NUMBER (in e-mail text) = no*vm = Na    ..no typos
       =  F*Vu / Moo*c^2 = F*rH*{e} / h    =   ("e")^64*F / 10^9
     =   F*c^2 / C2 = F*Vu*("e")^63 / 10^10  =  ("e")^4*u / me*{e}
  =   ("e")^68 / 1O^13*Qx   =  F*Vu / eH  = ("e")^4*u*c^2 / me*C2
= ("e")^4*u*Vu / (me)^2*a^2*c^2 = F / {e}  =   ("e")^68*u / 10^9*me
= ("e")^4*u*Vu / (me*ve)^2  = F*k*c / h  =  ("e")^60*u*mE / mSun*me
     =    F*rH / k*c    =   2*pi*Rx / k*hbar    =    Ra*c / rH*{e}
        =  Mol / (mol part)   =   1 / 10^29*hbar*{e} = Ra / k
=  5.994469365  x 1O^23 ..in the units -> (mol part) per Mol.

rH = Quantum Hall Resistance ..in Ohms.
mSun = Solar mass.
mE = Earth mass.
Moo = Hartree mass = eH / c^2.
u = Atomic mass unit.
me = Electron mass.
Vu = Standard Voltage potential at unit distance from unit charge.
Rx = Space Coupling Constant = (h + 2*hbar) / 2*pi.
Qx = Stefan-Boltzmann Radiation NUMBER (rationalized dimensionless).
eH  = Hartree energy = me*a^2*c^2.
C2  = Second Radiation Constant = {e}*c^2.
hbar = Dirac's Constant.
h = Planck's Constant = 2*pi*hbar.
{e} = Elementary electromagnetic CHARGE ..in Joule / V --> A*sec.
F = Faraday Constant ..in A*sec*(mol part) / Mol.
Ra = Molar Constant ..Joule / Mol*degK.
no = Loschmidt Constant ..in (mol part) / m^3.
vm = STANDARD Molar Ratio.
k = Boltzmann Constant ..in Joule / (mol part)*degK.
c = Reference VELOCiTY rate ..of electromagnetic radiation.
a = Fine Structure Constant.
ve = Classical Electron Velocity.
("e") = Naperian (or Natural) Logarithm Base Number Constant.
Mol = Na Molar Particles = Na*(mol part).
pi = ( circumference)^2 / sphere surface area
       = {(mp / u) - 1} / (ge - 2)
           = (pi + 1)*h / (h + 2*hbar)
                    = a / (ge - 2).
References...
1. 'UNiVERSAL PHYSiCAL CONSTANTS'
    Translated, from Russian, by Yevgeni Strelchenko;
(Revised from the 1984 Russian edition by O.P. Spiridonov):
 Page 103; The Photoelectric Effect: h*f = A + (m*v^2 / 2);
 Page 130~31; The mass of light mph = h*f / c^2;
 Page 202~3; ..NO arbitrary fundamental physical constants;
 Page 204; EPiLOGUE with EiNSTEiN's QUOTE:
[QUOTE AUTHOR] "Why is it that the values of the constants
are not obtained theoretically and should be measured
experimentally, sometimes with enormous difficulties? --
  -- What Einstein proposes is to get rid of dimensional
constants and replace them by dimensionless ones (which are
the ratios of, for example, one mass to another, one speed
to another and so on). He wrote in his autobiographical
notes: [QUOTE EiNSTEiN] "If one considers this done, then
only ‘dimensionless' constants could occur in the basic
equations of physics... nature is so constituted that it is
possible logically to lay down such strongly determined laws
that within these laws only rationally completely determined
constants occur (not constants, therefore, whose numerical
value could be changed without destroying the theory)"."
[UN-QUOTE EiNSTEiN & AUTHOR];   © Mir Publishers, Moscow.

2. 'THE UNiVERSE & DR. EiNSTEiN'; 1956;
    Comet Books / Collins; 1956 EDiTiON:
    Written by: Lincoln Barnett;
    SUB-Title: The Meaning of Time, Space and Matter
[With foreword by Albert Einstein; Princeton, New Jersey.]
[FOREWORD written: September 10, 1948; ..SEE: Pages 5 & 6]

3. 'FORMULAs FACTs AND CONSTANTs'; 1982 ~ 1987
    Edited by: H J Fishbeck and K H Fishbeck
    © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
    ISBN 3 540 17610 1

4. 'SCiENCE DATA BOOK'; 1971 ~ 1979
    Edited by: R M Tennent
    ISBN 0 05 002487 6
    © Oliver & Boyd

5. 'ELEMENTARY CHEMiCAL THERMODYNAMiCs'
    Written by: G Hargreaves & G Socrates
    © Butterworths & Co (Publishers) Ltd.
    Third Edition (1973) ..in SI Units;
    ISBN 0 408 70430 6 standard.
    Printed: 1961-63-65-67-73

6. 'BASiC CONCEPTs OF MEASUREMENT'; 1966
    © Cambridge University Press
    Written by: Brian Ellis
    LCCCN 65-1915

7. 'HARMONiC METROLOGY {iNTEGRATED STANDARD System}'
    © B A STUCKLESS; ISBN 0 9693164 1 0; {ISS}.wpd; 59KB.
"There are NO arbitrary FUNDAMENTAL physical CONSTANTs."
[‘AVAGADRO's NUMBER' (see above) is an exerpt from this.]
                       ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>

TiME 09:51iPMthu18mar2004; .. ... ... ...   © Brian A M STUCKLESS 
COReL WordPerfect 7 File < TheAoE.wpd > ><> ><> ><> End of rePOST

ACE's BOTTOM line, quote...
"The cartesian tensor vector and point mass are not applicable
to the universe or gravity."

Tom Roberts had a beautiful recent post on REAL "vectors".

GR_Tivity^gtr is POiNT-like >>>>o<<<< ..in REAL time.!!

ACE wrote:
> THE MINKOWSKI-REIMANN-EINSTEIN -GR THEORY
> Copyright 1984-2005 Allen C. Goodrich
> 
> The Minkowski metric 1908 and the Reimann generalization
> of euclidean geometry were used by Einstein in the
> general theory of relativity 1915.
> A vector is a cartesian tensor of rank one that can only be
> applicable in cartesian coordinate systems.
> The universe and gravity are not cartesian coordinate systems.
> Newton, Minkowski and Einstein visualized the point mass
> as a point of kinetic and potential energy.
> Allen C. Goodrich in 1984, showed that any mass m kinetic and
> potential energies , could only be defined rekative to the rest of
>  the universe M-m using the equations m(2 pi L)^2/t^2 for
> kinetic and G(M-m)m/L for potential energies in the fundamental
> equation of the universe.
> m(2 pi L)^2/t^2 + G(M-m)m/L = a constant. when no charges exist.
> The first law of thermodynamics states that the total energy of
> the universe is a constant. From this equation an event would be
> defined by Delta m(2 pi L)^2/t^2 = Delta -G(M-m)m/L
> The cartesian tensor vector and point mass are not applicable
> to the universe or gravity.