Article View: sci.physics.fusion
Article #1454Re: CNN report Fusion lights !
From: Kevin Postlewaite
Date: Thu, 02 May 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 02 May 1996 00:00
36 lines
2991 bytes
2991 bytes
harti@ddd.snafu.de (Stefan Hartmann) wrote: >I just saw on CNN a report about a new light source called: >Fusion light >It seems to be powered via a microwave transmitter and >has about 4 to 5 times the efficiency standard indescant bulbs... >Does anybdy know, how this is working ? >Does it use a neon gas inside the bulb ? >Is it not harmfull due to the huge microwave power ? There was a blurb a few issues back in Technology Review, a magazine put out by MIT to publicize work done there. It described a very high intensity, high efficiency light bulb that had been recently developed. It consisted of a bulb containing molecules of 2 identical atoms- I believe sodium, but I could be misremembering. It used a microwave generator to transfer energy to the molecules, which would release it as light. One of the advantages of this method is that the wavelength of the light emitted was dependent on the distance between the two atoms in the molecules, which constantly varied, allowing the bulb to produce an intense white light covering the visible spectrum. They mentioned that it had been put into use in the National Air & Space museum in Washington (I think that's where they said it was) and used only 4 bulbs to light the entire main room, where before they had been using many (64?) mercury lamps. They had also coupled the bulbs with a fiber optic pathway that would gradually release the photons along its pathway, so as to distribute the light usefully. I don't recall what the concerns were about using microwaves. I do remember that there was difficulty scaling it down to be practical for smaller applications: apparently they needed to develop microwave generators that worked efficiently at 1/1000th the current level. Also, to prevent the bub from overheating, the bulb must constantly rotate, introducing a possible source of mechanical failure. MIT has past issues of Technology Review online, but they don't put the entire magazine online and I don't think that this blurb is there. -Kevin
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4mads9$kmt@netnews.upenn.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<683JRyUeldB@ddd.snafu.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10830a,2c6e393e2467d2ad X-Google-Attributes: gid10830a,public X-Google-Thread: 107e5d,2c6e393e2467d2ad X-Google-Attributes: gid107e5d,public X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,2c6e393e2467d2ad X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public X-Google-Thread: 10b271,2c6e393e2467d2ad X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: fd325,2c6e393e2467d2ad X-Google-Attributes: gidfd325,public X-Google-Thread: 10607c,2c6e393e2467d2ad X-Google-Attributes: gid10607c,public From: kpost@econ.sas.upenn.edu (Kevin Postlewaite) Subject: Re: CNN report Fusion lights ! Date: 1996/05/02 Message-ID: <4mads9$kmt@netnews.upenn.edu> X-Deja-AN: 152590127 references: <683JRyUeldB@ddd.snafu.de> organization: University of Pennsylvania newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,cl.energie.alternativen,sci.energy,sci.environment,sci.physics,sci.physics.fusion