Article View: sci.physics.fusion
Article #999What Kind of Fool Am I?
From: blue
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:00
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:00
41 lines
2625 bytes
2625 bytes
For Jed's benefit, let me say right up front that I may well be foolish to keep asking questions about these experiments rather than just accepting everything that comes out of the CF community as the absolute end with no ifs ands or buts. But what the heck, that's why the gummint has given us this toy to exchange information over. Now back to Yamaguchi. First off, Jed, you should understand that I don't need to know Yamaguchi. It is the Yamaguchi experiment that is underdiscussion and, I started this by saying I didn't know enough about this $8 billion result. I still don't know very much about it, but if we keep whacking away at each other maybe we can get some things sorted out. Now I have one more piece of the puzzle. You say the chamber vacuum is 10^-8 Torr. I do a bit of arithmetic and come up with the number that that corresponds to the order of 10^11 molecules per liter residual gas. If the chamber is say 10 liters we get 10^12 molecules total. Now you tell us POOF goes a reaction and in a second we get 10^16 helium atoms. It would seem that the pressure would rise to shall we say 10^-4 Torr. Such an event would be hard to miss, right? Does the good Dr. Y comment on such events? Now we do same experiment over with hydrogen sandwich and no helium is formed. Does the pressure remain at 10^-8 Torr? Is there a pressure rise of any sort? Next I hit the books and read up on the effects of high pressure on peak shapes in mass spectrometers. Guess what, Jed? You can have nicely resolved peaks in your mass spec when the pressure of the residual gas is 10^-8 Torr and when the pressure rises to 10^-4 Torr the resolution goes to pot. In fact most of these devices don't work at all well above about 10^-5 Torr. One final comment as to whether vacuum is a good insulator. Ever hear of radiation? It is probably unfair for me pick on the Yamaguchi experiment on the basis of the information Jed has provided. My point really is that Jed is not a suitably critical filter so that his enthusiasm for these results should not be considered the final word on cold fusion. Dick Blue NSCL @ MSU
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<009640C7.FF1A9480.1908@dancer.nscl.msu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!pacbell.com!UB.com!zorch!fusionShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!pacbell.com!UB.com!zorch!fusion From: blue@nscl01.nscl.msu.edu Subject: What Kind of Fool Am I? Message-ID: <009640C7.FF1A9480.1908@dancer.nscl.msu.edu> Sender: scott@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Scott Hazen Mueller) Reply-To: blue@nscl01.nscl.msu.edu Organization: Sci.physics.fusion/Mail Gateway Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:00:47 GMT Lines: 41