Thread View: sci.physics.fusion
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by brian a m stuckless
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:36
Coup-GR-Tivity (after Einstein died).
Author: brian a m stuckless
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:36
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:36
48 lines
3514 bytes
3514 bytes
$$ Coup-GR-Tivity (after Einstein died):
$$ Coup-Ph.T scored BiG-time ..changing the "mass" definition.
Then calling EVERYbody stupid for saying h*f/c^2 is "mass".
[Ever SiNCE having CLAiMED the iNTELLECTUAL HiGHER ground].
Of course, no OTHER dicipline was THAT adamant, about mass.
[ALMOST worked.!! Ph.T ALMOST changed the EiNSTEiN "mass"].
$$ Einstein's LAW:
Any iNTRiNSiC REST energy e / c^2 = EQUiVALENT REST "mass".
$$ A good PRE-coup-Ph.T (after Einstein died) ANALYSiS, Harry.
$$ Hope this helps, ```Brian.
hhc314@yahoo.com wrote: > > Tom posted: >
> "None of that addresses the fact that we can't design buildings to
> sustain any sort of impact and/or explosion."
>
> Tom, history has demonstrated that we both can and have constructed
> large buildings that have demonstrated an ability to withstand such
> threats -- The problem actually is that today no one wants to pay the
> cost for this quality of construction or to accept the associated open
> floor space constraints/limitations.
> Disasters like the WTC are in my mind the result of weak spined
> structural engineers allowing real estate firms to dictate building
> design and priorities that, in this case, focused on unobstructed, open
> floor space, uniform building cross section, and the use of
> inexpensive, balloon style construction with its implicit domino
> failure mode.
>
> Had the buildings not been destroyed by terrorist jets, given enough
> time an office fire on any one of the upper floors would eventually
> have led to an identical outcome (but hopefully with fewer lives lost).
> WTC is, sadly, just another engineering disaster to add to the list.
>
> Note that in spite of many fires, airplane collisions, and bombs, all
> of the great skyscrapers built prior to 1950 are still standing. It is
> interesting to note that virtually none of these represent a uniform
> building cross section nor shell supported, balloon construction
> technology. Evidently buildings of this calibre are simply too time
> consuming and costly to construct today, or simply that insurance is
> cheaper than quality engineering and construction.
>
> Just my thoughts on the subject.
>
> Kindest regards, Harry C.
Re: Bad Joints Caused Pancake Collapse of WTC
Re: Coup-GR-Tivity (after Einstein died).
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads