🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: sci.physics.fusion
1 messages
1 total messages Started by brian a m stuckless Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:43
No G_uv equated mass or hbar, in GR ..profoundly.
#1335
Author: brian a m stuckless
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:43
49 lines
3418 bytes
$$ The TimeLord wrote [GR REST mass]: >> Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
            > >> > guskz@hotmail.com wrote:
> >> > > I know they say a photon **doesn't** have a [REST] mass.
> -=- energy of a single photon is E=p*c by experiment and from SR

$$               The GR-coup (after Einstein died).
$$ WhereEVER:        E = p*c = m*c^2 = h*f   ..there is NO h, in GR.!!
$$ THERE:                      m = E/c^2. DENYiNG this ..is coup-GR.!!
$$ ALSO note that there is NO *equated* "mass", WHAT-so-EVER, in GR.!!

> -=- they would also have a gravitational field, which they don't.
$$ That photons have a FiELD ..is the "Eclipse-PROOF" of GR Tivity.
$$ The PROBLEM is ..No GR TEST-mass can HAVE a g-FiELD ..in THEORY.

> [...]
> The UP applies to conjugate parameters such as position-momentum

$$     SPEED is ANY PATH/duration ; VELOCiTY the VECTOR/duration. 
There are NO "conjugate parameters" of "position-momentum" ..dimwits.
You caN'T KNOW the MOMENTUM withOUT *FiRST* KNOWiNG BOTH vector ends.
You caN'T KNOW the MOMENTUM withOUT *FiRST* KNOWiNG vector-POSiTiONs.

$$  Heisenberg was NOT WRONG ..just because he GOT CAUGHT too OFTEN,
    "Trying to ((focus)) on BOTH ENDs of VELOCiTY vectors, at once!"

> or energy-time. Mass does not enter the UP.
$$ Note No ANGULAR momentum, No PLANCK h and NO "mass" in GEOMETRY.!!
 
> However, Relativity predicts that photons have zero mass, not
> some average of zero, but actual zero.  -=-
>               Photons are always called "light".

> >>     m = p = 0
$$ No ANGULAR momentum, No PLANCK h and No *EQUATED* "mass", in GR.!!

> > Show how you overthrew E=mc^2 +(energy of motion) with that -=-
>                     What contradictions? >
> What better explanation? The *fact* that photons have zero
>    [REST] mass is perfectly explained by Relativity. -=-
$$  The GR Tivity has ABSOLUTELY *zero* G-uv *equated* mass, in it.

$$  Hope this helps,         ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).

> > It is you who will not listen because you are both dishonest and
> >     impaired with a mental illness, plus, you're a moron.
> --
> // The TimeLord says: > // Pogo 2.0 = -=- ..aliens are us!
Re: is there a "theoretical" [REST] mass for a photon ???
Re: No G_uv equated mass or hbar, in GR ..profoundly.
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads