🚀 go-pugleaf

[ The GR buff ]; Tom [ He between his ERROR-bars ] Roberts wrote:
> > Any given ray of light passing any massive object does not
> > split in Chromatic aberration, but does curve in a sharp ray.
> > (E.g. starlight passing planets.)          -- [ LeoK ]

$$                       Tom's GR Coyness.
>        There is no chromatic aberration in the deflection
>       of light by a mass (e.g. the sun [with NO atmosphere])
>        -- that's how we know for sure the deflection is
$$      [--"that's how we know for sure the DEFLECTiON is"..]
>       gravitational, and not optical [-NOT optical-] due to
>       the sun's corona or atmosphere [No atmospheres in GR].

$$       That light HAS mass WAS experimental PROOF of GR.
$$  The Sun has NO atmosphere (ambient), in Newton or GR Tivity.
$$  Eddington measured light DEFLECTiON off PHOTOgraphic plates.

>          You just don't understand modern physics.

> At present, all experimental measurement of the photon [REST]
> mass are consistent with zero, and place an extraordinarily
> small upper bound on it.

$$      LiGHT-mass PROOF "scaled off" photographic plates.
 -=- Tom confuses the definitions of different theories here,
   (and apparently never heard of the Light-mass-PROOF ..of GR).

$$  A Photon PATH fL "shift" (defelection) = ANGULAR fA "shift".

> Tom [He between his ERROR-bars] Roberts  tjroberts@lucent.com
$$  Go-go Google GROUP < My BiGGER bang.!! >< ascii iSS GUESS >.
$$        Re: Delta fL=(d)fA, light-PATH-deflection.
Re: REST Math=eM/c^2.                      Re: ANY flux formula.
Re: The General Universal Equation of State (GUESS iSS), System.
Re: Light-mass-proof (photographic plates) of GR ..the evidence.
Re: "-- that's how we know for sure the deflection is.." -Tom R.
Re: is there a "theoretical" [REST] mass for a photon ???.