(Personal æther) Ambiance for GR-dummys.

Thread View: sci.physics.fusion

1 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

1 total messages Started by brian a m stuckless Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:58

#1362

Author: brian a m stuckless
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:58

25 lines
2388 bytes

PD wrote: > > Henri Wilson wrote: > > On 2 Feb 2006 06:00:11 -0800,
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote: >> >Henri Wilson wrote: On
1 Feb 2006 14:44:31 -0800, "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote:
> > -=- [snip] John Kennaugh has summed this up most beautifully.
> >
> >            SR simply assumes that every observer has
> >                  its own 'personal aether'.
>
> Exactly. And because each "personal ether" is just as convincing
> as any other's, there is no single, preferred ether that can be
> physically distinguished. Because there is no single ether that
> is physically distinguishable, -=-

$$            "Personal æther" ..Ambiance for GR-dummys.
$$ You are mixing and/or alternately dropping "preferred" ..implying
   that BECAUSE there are SO many DiFFERENT æther (to each an æther)
   "no single ether .. is physically distinguishable". EVERYbody's
   æther is DiSTiNGUiSHABLE in your 1st sentence, But, *NONE* AT ALL
   DiSTiNGUiSHABLE in your own 2nd sentence (SAME paragraph), Dimwit.
    ```Brian.

> -=- and since the mechanism of *any* ether is not required to
> explain the effects observed (unlike LET), then the entire notion
> of the ether can be safely abandoned. > > PD
Re: (Personal æther) Ambiance for GR-dummys.

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads