🚀 go-pugleaf

Sue... wrote: > > FrediFizzx wrote:
> > "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> > news:1139958027.166486.181870@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > | Relastic wrote:  -=-
> > | > Also some clarifications. The curvature in spacetime
> > | > is not entirely mathematical, isn't it.
> > |
> > | Two bodies can occupy the same space but not
> > | at the same time. That seems fairly real.
> >
> > How could we possibly tell if it was really the same space?
> > What is the reference point?  ;-)

$$                     The REFERENCE hole.
 One POSSiBLE way is the PEG-in-the-HOLE Test ..you use the SAME hole.
 Temperatures EQUAL, a UNiT plug CANNOT fit a UNiT hole in REAL space.
 But, don't FORGET to use a DiFFERENT plug. Hope this helps. ```Brian.
                          -=- -=- -=-

> <... Einstein did not use any argument related to
> simultaneity or Doppler shift in his analysis. I discuss
> Einstein's resolution and several conceptual issues
> that arise. It is concluded that Einstein's resolution using
> gravitational time dilation suffers from logical and
> physical flaws, and gives incorrect answers in a general
> setting. The counter examples imply the need to reconsider
> many issues related to the comparison of transported
> clocks. The failure of the accepted views and
> resolutions is traced to the fact that the special relativity
> principle formulated originally for physics in empty
> space is not valid in the matter-filled universe. >>
> --C. S. Unnikrishnan
> Gravitation Group,
> Tata Institute of Fundamental Research,
> Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400 005, India
> http://www.iisc.ernet.in/currsci/dec252005/2009.pdf

> Indeed... It is called 'matter'. :o)
 -=-
> Sue... > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Relastic
                          -=- -=- -=-
> Sue... > > h > > > > FrediFizzx > > http://www.vacuum-physics.com
Re: GR book recommendations, is spacetime concept just mathematical?
Re: REFERENCE hole.