🚀 go-pugleaf

[New NOTEs];  Sue... wrote: > brian a m stuckless wrote: [..Edited].

[NOTE a SPREAD of 2, for n=0 and n=2, between the (+ AND -) FORCEs].

1.  Elementary CHARGE (i.e. Amp*sec), {e} ..ARiTHMETiCALLY speaking:
>           Elementary charge pair e+ e-  > 0.511 MeV x 2
$$  You LEFT OUT proton (Mine e+ e+, p+ e-, e+ e-, e- e-). ```Brian.
$$         ELEMENTARY charge ENTRANCEs & EXiTs ..illustrated:
>      < http://www.rwc.uc.edu/koehler/biophys.2ed/fields.html >
> << This plot illustrates the electrical potential and field lines
> of a [SPECiAL] dipole: a pair of charges with equal magnitude but
> opposite sign. Here, the positive charge is on the left, and the
> field lines exit it and enter the negative charge on the right. >>
$$                                                _ _ _ _ _
$$                                               / (C_2)^2
$$ (+ OR -) Elementary CHARGE {e} = (+ OR -),   / -- --- --
$$                                           /\/    c^4    ,.
$$ ..Where, C_2 is the Standard SI, '2nd Radiation Constant'.

2. BECAUSE the Coulomb FORCE, F_c (..GUESS-iSS-CORRECTED, version):
$$
$$                                 k_c*(q1*q2)
$$ (+ OR -) Coulomb FORCE, F_c =  -- -- - -- --
$$                                (n_c - 1)*r^2,.
$$   k_c is Coulomb's Constant.
$$   (n_c - 1) is a GUESS iSS, 'Finer STRUCTURE Variable'.
$$   Note a SPREAD of 2 for n_c=0 & n_c=2 , between (+ AND -), F_c.

3. Finally, note.. Gravitational FORCE, m1*g (GUESS-iSS-CORRECTED):
$$
$$                                       G*(M1*m1)
$$ (+ OR -) Gravitational FORCE, m1*g = -- -- -- --
$$                                      (n - 1)*r^2,.
$$
$$                G is the Gravitational Constant.
$$       (n - 1) is a  GUESS iSS, 'Finer STRUCTURE Variable'.
$$   Note a SPREAD of 2 for n=0 and n=2 , between (+ AND -), m1*g.

$$   Note the GUESS iSS Standard + is OUTgoing, and - is iNcoming.

> << The electric fields due to multiple sources superpose,
> as do the forces they exert on a test charge. But because the
> electric field has direction, the computation of the superposed
> field must be done using components: >>

$$ OFFiCiALLY an electron has NO scientific reason for "FLOATiNG".

> Why is the sky blue?  :o) > > Sue... > > >
4. Clearly, (n - 1) & (n_c - 1) are Finer AMBiENT MEDiA Variables.

$$         NEWTON & EiNSTEiN both FORGOT about *BUOYANCY*.
  Coulomb's UNmodified FORCE equation has .."ad-hoc" Change-of-SiGN.
  Newton's UNmodified FORCE equation has NO "ad-hoc" Change-of-SiGN.
  Newton's UNmodified FORCE equation DOEs NOT HAVE a Change-of-SiGN.

>                     Gravitational Forces
> The force of gravity is completely analogous to the Coulomb force:
>
>  << [F_c] = G m1 m2 / [n - 1]*r2.  ..[Brackets mine ```Brian].

$$    GUESS iSS, G_relative = G_absolute / G = 1 / (n - 1) = Gr.

> Note that gravitational forces are always attractive, -=-

    No ..NOT "as-measured". Take bobbing Air-ships, for example:
    MEASUREMENTs of g for an air-ship gives (+ AND -), g-FORCEs.
    [However, max POTENTiAL acceleration g @ r is MATHEMATiCAL].

> -=- since mass is always positive.

    No. The SiGNETiC mass mS is mD - m1 and mS is 0, @ BUOYANCY.
    Where n = mD / m1 = 1, @ BUOYANCY in Weightless equilibrium.
    Since (n - 1) = 0 = (mD - m1) / m1, @ BUOYANCY ..in AMBiENT.

$$  Note a DiFFERENCE between REAL mass is CALCULATED, NOT REAL.
    Note a DiFFERENCE between REAL mass CAN be *NEGATiVE*, also.
    Note a DiFFERENCE between REAL mass is NOT ALSO a REAL mass.

> In exactly the same way [ANALOGY] as with the electric field, we
> can define a gravitational [g] field whose units are N / kg. >>

$$  The units of G ATTRACTiON are, m^3/kg*(sec)^2 = m^3/kg/(sec)^2.
$$  The units of g ACCELERATiON are, m/(sec)^2.    [Brackets mine].

$$          The Newton & Coulomb are both REDUNDANT units.
  DoN'T keep TRYing to UNnecessarily COMPLiCATE what is SiMPLiFiED.

$$ As scientists, with our EQUATiONs, we equate BOTH sides AT ONCE.
  [Of course, it's NOT clear HOW to see THAT affects wiggle delay].
$$   Try, (the SEPARATED TRAVELED distance d) / (DURATiON, t2 - t1)
                 = (the TRAVELED PATH Length) / (TRAVEL Time)
                 = the LiGHT speed v (c's a MATHEMATiCAL constant).

$$            Feynman's MENTAL ideas areN'T "physical".
> > Sue... wrote: > Hexenmeister wrote: -=- I can still remember,
> > > "It seems that some essentially new physical ideas are here
> > > needed."' - Feynman. -=- 
> > > > Your idea of an electron is a little [POiNT] ball with a
> > > > minus sign written on the side and radial arrows sticking
> > > > out of it in all directions that you call "charge".
> > > > Androcles > Sue... > >                  $$ [Brackets mine].
Go-go Google GROUP SEARCH < My BiGGER bang.!! >< ascii iSS GUESS >.

CLOSE:                    Brian A M Stuckless, over over over & OUT.
$$                               ^.
GUESS (RESTmass)*c^4=(iNTRiNSiC energy e)*c^2=(mol part)*K*Volt*meter.
$$                     My GUESS iSS STANDARD
$$                   <   The STANDARD set.   >

> > Re: Elementary CHARGE (+ OR -), {e}.
Re: Feynman's MENTAL ideas areN'T "physical".