Article View: sci.physics.particle
Article #45Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
From: cjcountess
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:25
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:25
28 lines
3279 bytes
3279 bytes
Hi Mitch
This is Conrad Countess
Electrons are only considered point particles by some because no one
has measured them and some people cannot imagine them as anything but
points.
But I am attempting to measure them by inference as a logical
extension of what has been measured such as single photon amplitudes,
two rotations to complete one wave cycle, and backward spin counter to
its trajectory. If a photon falls along the same EM spectrum as
electron with the difference determined by momentum as stated by Bohr
and Compton, and its wavelength can be equated to the circumference of
a circle according to Bohr, than it must have a radius of half that
circle. Besides if they were infinitely small point particles they
would not be able to illuminate things in electron microscopes.
Furthermore infinite smallness implies infinite frequency which
implies infinite mass and black holes.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/debrog.html#c3
http://www.colorado.edu/physics/2000/quantumzone/debroglie.html
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/130389/Compton-wavelength
which includes this statement:
...(λ) the scattering event differ by λ′ - λ = (h/mc)(1 - cos
θ). Here m is the rest mass of the electron and h/mc is called Compton
wavelength. It has the value 0.0243 angstrom. The energy hν of a
photon of this wavelength is equal to the rest mass energy mc2 of an
electron. One might argue...
Conrad Countess
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2aef8d16-1824-43c8-9e6d-1a0721ec5bb5@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<37bc1407-57d5-4632-abd5-b3fb37082dd2@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com> <2d6dd978-e3c8-417c-bf6d-ca2b95267253@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <5b2cb379-47e4-4c39-93d0-5b16ef2a0b9d@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <2d16c15a-73ee-4344-b369-e1e693b9c0dd@a2g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <1adfe2ef-6cfd-4f21-a9a7-6ef073f8e95b@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <eb853e6a-5601-4af3-b447-a1d26f8943a0@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <b3e7c229-414d-4c86-883d-87c651522acf@1g2000pre.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f6c41,b2c2349f443d6943 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b2c2349f443d6943 X-Google-Thread: 104f62,b2c2349f443d6943 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6c41,gid10b271,gid104f62,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: Japanese,JIS Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: cjcountess <cjcountess@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.particle,sci.physics,dk.videnskab Subject: Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON? Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 28 Message-ID: <2aef8d16-1824-43c8-9e6d-1a0721ec5bb5@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com> References: <37bc1407-57d5-4632-abd5-b3fb37082dd2@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com> <2d6dd978-e3c8-417c-bf6d-ca2b95267253@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <5b2cb379-47e4-4c39-93d0-5b16ef2a0b9d@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <2d16c15a-73ee-4344-b369-e1e693b9c0dd@a2g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <1adfe2ef-6cfd-4f21-a9a7-6ef073f8e95b@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <eb853e6a-5601-4af3-b447-a1d26f8943a0@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <b3e7c229-414d-4c86-883d-87c651522acf@1g2000pre.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.26.106.9 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217517929 14345 127.0.0.1 (31 Jul 2008 15:25:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.26.106.9; posting-account=SWr-zgoAAABXP_I1KRp8SBR28UDaox2f User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.15) Gecko/20080625 Ubuntu/7.10 (gutsy) Firefox/2.0.0.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)