🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jul 27, 10:02 pm, "Y.y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 27, 6:23 pm, john <vega...@accesscomm.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 27, 8:02 am, "Y.y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 27, 6:27 am, "zzbun...@netscape.net" <zzbun...@netscape.net>
> > > wrote:> On Jul 24, 6:12 pm, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
>
> > > > > Questions:
> > > > > - What is the value of the experimentally measured ’radius’ of the
> > > > > electron?
> > > > > - What is the value of the experimentally measured ’radius’ of the
> > > > > proton?
>
> > > >    Zero for both. Since the radius isn't even measured for either.
> > > >    You measure scattering potentials.
>
> > > ---------------
> > > but he is not interested in your fucken   'scattering potential '
> > > nore in your fucken  methematical  crippled   formulas
>
> > > he is not interested in crackparroters
> > > he is interested in some advance !!!
>
> > > Y.Porat
> > > ------------------------------------
>
> > > Which is why post druid people
>
> > > >    use computers, lasers, DVD, and A.I  rather than wanks like
> > > > scienitists
> > > >    when working with electrons.
>
> > > > > Best regards
> > > > > Louis Nielsen
> > > > > Denmark
>
> > The electron is not a spherical thing.
> > It is an arm of scattered energy points stretching
> > from the nucleus and arcing out as part of a
> > disc of energy. It is flat.
> > It can be more or less extended depending on the circumstances
> > of the atom.
>
> > John
> > Galaxy Model
>
> -----------------
> Hey John !!
>
> you are so close to my findings that i start worrying !!(:-)
>
> where and what    is your model??
> was it 'inspired'       by my model ???
>
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ---------------------


Hi Y.

My model was inspired by comparing atoms to galaxies.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/john
I conceived it in 1983.

Check it out!

John