🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jul 27, 6:23 pm, john <vega...@accesscomm.ca> wrote:
> On Jul 27, 8:02 am, "Y.y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 27, 6:27 am, "zzbun...@netscape.net" <zzbun...@netscape.net>
> > wrote:> On Jul 24, 6:12 pm, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
>
> > > > Questions:
> > > > - What is the value of the experimentally measured ’radius’ of the
> > > > electron?
> > > > - What is the value of the experimentally measured ’radius’ of the
> > > > proton?
>
> > >    Zero for both. Since the radius isn't even measured for either.
> > >    You measure scattering potentials.
>
> > ---------------
> > but he is not interested in your fucken   'scattering potential '
> > nore in your fucken  methematical  crippled   formulas
>
> > he is not interested in crackparroters
> > he is interested in some advance !!!
>
> > Y.Porat
> > ------------------------------------
>
> > Which is why post druid people
>
> > >    use computers, lasers, DVD, and A.I  rather than wanks like
> > > scienitists
> > >    when working with electrons.
>
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Louis Nielsen
> > > > Denmark
>
> The electron is not a spherical thing.
> It is an arm of scattered energy points stretching
> from the nucleus and arcing out as part of a
> disc of energy. It is flat.
> It can be more or less extended depending on the circumstances
> of the atom.
>
> John
> Galaxy Model

-----------------
Hey John !!

you are so close to my findings that i start worrying !!(:-)

where and what    is your model??
was it 'inspired'       by my model ???

TIA
Y.Porat
---------------------