🚀 go-pugleaf

On 25 Jul., 11:32, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 25, 12:13 pm, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 25 Jul., 00:45, tadchem <tadc...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 24, 6:12 pm, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
>
> > > > Questions:
> > > > - What is the value of the experimentally measured ’radius’ of the
> > > > electron?
> > > > - What is the value of the experimentally measured ’radius’ of the
> > > > proton?
>
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Louis Nielsen
> > > > Denmark
>
> > > What does a shadow weigh?
>
> > > Your question has no answer because it presumes something that has not
> > > yet been established - i.e. that an electron has, in some plane, a
> > > circular cross section that is independent of the means by which it
> > > may be measured.
>
> > > The electron is not a geometrical object. It has no geometrical
> > > properties.
>
> > > It is a *physical* object.  It has physical properties such as rest
> > > mass, charge, spin, angular momentum, etc.
>
> > > "Why is there air?" - Bill Cosby (1965)
>
> > > Tom Davidson
> > > Richmond, VA
>
> > ARE ELECTRONS PHYSICAL ENTITIES?
> > If an electron is a physical matter-/energy ‘particle’ then it MUST
> > have a maybe not definite mean geometrical extension.
>
> > THE STANDARD-MODEL IS NOT ULTIMATE, MAYBE WRONG?
> > It is in the not ultimate standard-model of ‘elementary-particles’
> > that an electron is described without a physical geometrical
> > extension.
> > In the standard-model of ‘elementary-particles’ the electron is
> > described as a ‘point-particle’ that have been given AD HOC physical
> > properties as mass, electric charge, spin, magnetic moment etc.
>
> > It must be time experimentally to discover the ‘true’ nature of the
> > electron!
>
> > Best regards
> > Louis Nielsen
> > Denmark
>
> --------------
> right!!
>
> now as is now there is no technical tool to do it
>
> so the way to do it as for now
> is to  cpllect all known data
> and make a good   guess
> so
> at our situation there is nothing to do but
> **trial and error*
> i agree with you that if it is a physical entity
> the mathematical presentation or model or crippled model
>
> IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO MAKE FURTHER  REAL ADVANCE
> IN SCIENCE
>
> ATB
> Y.Porat
> ----------------------- Skjul tekst i anførselstegn -
>
> - Vis tekst i anførselstegn -

What about the following considerations?

ARE ELECTRONS COMPOSITE QUANTUM-DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS?
- Is the electron composed of a huge number of very tiny energy-/
matter ‘particles’?
- Is the electron maybe composed of condensed systems of photons?

If the electron is an elastic dynamical quantum-system composed of
more ‘fundamental particles’ then the electron can have a variable
geometrical shape depending of its actual state of energy.

EXTENSION OF AN ELECTRON
- About the geometrical extension of an electron we can ask: What is
the mean geometrical extension of an electron when it is in its lowest
state of energy?

EMISSION OF PHOTONS FROM UNSTABLE DECAYING ELECTRONS
- Are photons emitted from unstable electrons that decay (like
radioactive nuclei) maybe in steps from a higher state of energy with
excess of ‘condensed photons’ to lower states of energy?

Best regards
Louis Nielsen
Denmark