Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #1Re: Is anti-time relative, too???
From: Jeckyl
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 03:19
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 03:19
5 lines
1198 bytes
1198 bytes
"Victor Smootbank" <mean_priests@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1188602276.890644.158970@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > Or is anti-time just anti-relative??? I think that was anti-physics
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<13dhmj5tlrn2aca@corp.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!sn-xt-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1188602276.890644.158970@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,8be9969f80bfaa23 X-Google-Thread: 1033ee,8be9969f80bfaa23 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid1033ee,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!sn-xt-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Jeckyl" <noone@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,abg.mampf Subject: Re: Is anti-time relative, too??? Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 13:19:53 +1000 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <13dhmj5tlrn2aca@corp.supernews.com> References: <1188602276.890644.158970@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Lines: 7 X-Original-Bytes: 931