🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #1059

Re: DARK ENERGY OR TIRED LIGHT (DECREASED SPEED OF PHOTONS)?

#1059
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 11:43
41 lines
4148 bytes
On Oct 3, 10:48 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Einsteinians make career and money by devising new idiocies while
> going around the truth:
>
> http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/erasing_dark_energy/
> "AGAINST ALL REASON, the universe is accelerating its expansion. (...)
> To Temple and Smoller, mathematicians at the University of California–
> Davis and the University of Michigan, respectively, dark energy seemed
> an ad hoc addition to cosmology. (...) But as an explanation to
> replace dark energy, there are at least two serious problems with
> Temple and Smoller’s wave of expansion, cosmologists say. (...) But
> perhaps the largest objection voiced is that this model would require
> Earth to be at the center of the universe. In other words, it would
> violate the Copernican principle, which states that the Earth does not
> have a special, favored place and that the universe is essentially
> homogeneous."

The above idiocy looks insurmountable but there is always a greater
idiocy in Einsteiniana:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1134/is_10_117/ai_n31116578/
"Even if we set the value of the cosmological constant to account for
the accelerating expansion of the universe, the implications of a
nonzero constant boggle the mind. The constant's mathematical value
corresponds to the amount of dark energy that lurks in every cubic
centimeter of space. It follows that, as the cosmos expands and new
space comes into existence, every cubic centimeter of new space will
contain just as much dark energy as every old cubic centimeter does.
Accordingly, the universe not only expands at an accelerating rate,
but also produces a correspondingly growing amount of dark energy.
Here we find the ultimate free lunch--energy produced without any
investment beyond the original creation of the universe. But doesn't
this violate the law of conservation of energy, which states that the
total amount of energy remains constant, though it may change its form
(matter being a form of energy, with a value expressed by Einstein's
famous equation, E = [mc.sup.2])? No, because this law applies to any
isolated, closed system--and the universe, which continuously creates
new space, does not satisfy that condition."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <14b442d1-c851-43f3-9361-13c9ce2b5845@33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <60b568fb-df8c-43d5-9694-2f416d3a4c4d@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <4AABCF2E.C51408D3@hate.spam.net> <c4cea810-019f-4ea8-bc99-d785a824dd6d@e12g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <23b14328-82ec-404c-b5eb-8517f2cb810a@c37g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <742f4847-16b1-4f80-81e8-553d6365dd44@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <WTcrm.41996$5n1.3449@attbi_s21> <8555eed0-f2b3-45a5-b5ce-9ed641507804@e4g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <RIqrm.50490$la3.34592@attbi_s22> <7d82de1d-8171-45ca-ae7d-46b1c6e84f11@t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <960d1518-eab1-4e63-8feb-8f8eca6d3411@z34g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 237b8ad48,99f898ba51f96898
X-Google-Attributes: gid237b8ad48,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Subject: Re: DARK ENERGY OR TIRED LIGHT (DECREASED SPEED OF PHOTONS)?
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 04:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <14b442d1-c851-43f3-9361-13c9ce2b5845@33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
References: <60b568fb-df8c-43d5-9694-2f416d3a4c4d@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> 
 <4AABCF2E.C51408D3@hate.spam.net> <c4cea810-019f-4ea8-bc99-d785a824dd6d@e12g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <23b14328-82ec-404c-b5eb-8517f2cb810a@c37g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <742f4847-16b1-4f80-81e8-553d6365dd44@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
 <WTcrm.41996$5n1.3449@attbi_s21> <8555eed0-f2b3-45a5-b5ce-9ed641507804@e4g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
 <RIqrm.50490$la3.34592@attbi_s22> <7d82de1d-8171-45ca-ae7d-46b1c6e84f11@t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
 <960d1518-eab1-4e63-8feb-8f8eca6d3411@z34g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.215.201.39
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1254570237 6745 127.0.0.1 (3 Oct 2009 11:43:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 11:43:57 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.215.201.39; 
 posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 
 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)