🚀 go-pugleaf

On 25 Dec, 05:30, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote:
> "GSS" <gurcharn_san...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:05264a22-4aba-49e9-987a-b934ddf51b31@d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > On Dec 25, 3:37 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote:
> >> G_uv = GOD.
> >> See George Hammond.
> >> This is PHYSICS, not math or logic, and proof is completely irrelevant.
> >> See Tom Roberts.
>
> >> The speed of light from A to B is c-v,
> >> the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
> >> the "time" each way is the same.
> >> See Albert Einstein.
>
> >> Fucking nutters all.
>
> > In your opinion, what compels the scientific community - an
> > intellectual 'cream' of humanity'- to keep blindly following such
> > 'nutters', like a herd of sheep?
>
> In my opinion the scientific community consists of engineers, biochemists,
> chemists, biologists, geologists and medical professionals (my apologies to
> any specialist groups such as geneticists I've overlooked), and doesn't
> include mathematicians (who are intellectual artists) or theoretical
> physicists
> who are fruit cakes.
>
> In your opinion, what compels you to believe theoretical
> physicists are the intellectual 'cream' of the scientific
> community - and to keep blindly following such propaganda like a > flock of Hawking wheel chairschased by paparazzi?

Despite all our efforts proof is only relevant where it leads to
empirically testable propositions capable in principle of being
falsfied - or on the other hand, propositions that are not self-
cotradictiory *and* true by definition.

This leaves, in either case, a huge pile of propositions that may be
satisfyingly true in Harry Potter Land, Line Land, etc.

Merry Xmas and have a bountiful New Year,
--
foolsrushin.