Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #1109Re: EINSTEIN WRONG: THE SHORTEST PROOF
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:28
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:28
44 lines
3437 bytes
3437 bytes
Premise: Einstein's equivalence principle Conclusions: If the speed of light varies with the gravitational potential V in accordance with Einstein's 1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) given by Newton's emission theory of light, then the speed of light varies with the speed of the light source v in accordance with the equation c'=c+v given again by Newton's emission theory of light, that is, Einstein's 1905 light postulate is false. If the speed of light varies with the gravitational potential V in accordance with Einstein's 1915 equation c'=c(1+2V/c^2), then the speed of light varies with the speed of the light source v in accordance with the equation c'=c+2v, that is, Einstein's 1905 light postulate is false. If the speed of light does not vary with the gravitational potential V (Einstein would not agree but nowadays silly Einsteinians do teach so), then the speed of light does not vary with the speed of the light source v either, that is, Einstein's 1905 light postulate is true. Pentcho Valev wrote: Premise: The wavelength is determined by the light source and cannot depend on the movements of the observer. Premise: (frequency)=(speed of light)/(wavelength) Conclusion: If the observer is initially at rest relative to but then starts moving towards the light source, the frequency (Doppler effect) and THE SPEED OF LIGHT INCREASE. Compare with John Norton's reasoning (the TEXT IN CAPITALS is wrong): http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/HPS_0410/chapters/big_bang/index.html John Norton: "Here's a light wave and an observer. If the observer were to hurry towards the source of the light, the observer would now pass wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would mean that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to have increased (AND CORRESPONDINGLY FOR THE WAVELENGTH - THE DISTANCE BETWEEN CRESTS - TO HAVE DECREASED)." Pentcho Valev pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<77875922-55a9-40ef-89a7-7b0464552751@w10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!w10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<f4f9d685-2290-4f8e-a4a1-bfceee23f49e@r9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <b70807de-83ab-4ddf-8990-53e110fc25b4@e8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> <b8b8ff64-2c1b-4310-af4e-7e748d893b80@y36g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 237b8ad48,d5f4e3bcb2fbebe0 X-Google-Attributes: gid237b8ad48,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!w10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique Subject: Re: EINSTEIN WRONG: THE SHORTEST PROOF Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 04:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 44 Message-ID: <77875922-55a9-40ef-89a7-7b0464552751@w10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> References: <f4f9d685-2290-4f8e-a4a1-bfceee23f49e@r9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <b70807de-83ab-4ddf-8990-53e110fc25b4@e8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> <b8b8ff64-2c1b-4310-af4e-7e748d893b80@y36g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.215.201.52 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1252841337 24300 127.0.0.1 (13 Sep 2009 11:28:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:28:57 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: w10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.215.201.52; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; GTB6; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)