🚀 go-pugleaf

"harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message 
news:66eea628-1833-43c9-8a45-d448e1871d99@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 10, 7:10 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Premise: The wavelength is determined by the light source and cannot
> depend on the movements of the observer.
>
> Premise: (frequency)=(speed of light)/(wavelength)
>
> Conclusion: If the observer is initially at rest relative to but then
> starts moving towards the light source, the frequency (Doppler effect)
> and THE SPEED OF LIGHT INCREASE.
>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...@yahoo.com

Try this variant of your argument:

'Premise: The frequency is determined by the light source and cannot
depend on the movements of the observer.

Premise: (frequency)=(speed of light)/(wavelength)

Conclusion: If the observer is initially at rest relative to but then
starts moving towards the light source, the wavelength decreases
(Doppler effect)
and THE SPEED OF LIGHT INCREASES.'

;-)
==============================================
Try this variant of your argument:

'Premise: The frequency is determined by the light source and cannot
depend on the movements of the observer.

Premise: (wavelength)=(speed of light)/ (frequency)


Conclusion: If the observer is initially at rest relative to but then
starts moving towards the light source, the APPARENT frequency
increases for the observer (Doppler effect) and THE SPEED OF
LIGHT/sound/water waves INCREASES relative to the observer
and remains the same relative to the source.

Your premise is fucked. ;-)