🚀 go-pugleaf

In 1887 the Michelson-Morley experiment confirmed the antithesis of
Einstein's 1905 light postulate, the equation c'=c+v given by Newton's
emission theory of light, and contradicted the thesis that the speed
of light is independent of the speed of the light source (the future
light postulate). Now Einsteinians fiercely teach that the Michelson-
Morley experiment so unambiguously confirmed the thesis that the speed
of light is independent of the speed of the light source that Einstein
had no other choice but to advance his 1905 light postulate.

Neither the 1919 nor any other solar eclipse was able to supply
reliable data allowing one to discriminate between deflection
predicted by Newton's emission theory of light and deflection
predicted by Divine Albert's Divine Theory, no matter how modern
methods were used. Yet Einsteinians fiercely teach that in 1919 Arthur
Eddington gloriously confirmed Divine Albert's Divine Theory.

In 1960 Pound and Rebka measured the gravitational redshift factor to
be 1+V/c^2, where V is the gravitational potential. Einsteinians
fircely teach that this result was a glorious confirmation of Divine
Albert's Divine Theory but close inspection shows that in fact it
REFUTED Divine Albert's Divine Theory.

In 1924 Arthur Eddington forced Walter Adams to cheat: Adams published
the gravitational redshift suggested by Eddington and predicted by
Divine Albert's Divine Theory, not the gravitational redshift he had
really measured (the Sirius B fraud). Yet for 50 years this was
regarded as the most reliable confirmation of Divine Albert's Divine
Theory.

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com