🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sep 3, 8:22 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In 1887 the Michelson-Morley experiment confirmed the antithesis of
> Einstein's 1905 light postulate, the equation c'=c+v given by Newton's
> emission theory of light, and contradicted the thesis that the speed
> of light is independent of the speed of the light source (the future
> light postulate). Now Einsteinians fiercely teach that the Michelson-
> Morley experiment so unambiguously confirmed the thesis that the speed
> of light is independent of the speed of the light source that Einstein
> had no other choice but to advance his 1905 light postulate.

   Well, most of SR is custom-made for philisophic revisionist idiots
   to begin with, so most of is called crap with am ultra naive set
theory buffion,
   rather than merely crap.




>
> Neither the 1919 nor any other solar eclipse was able to supply
> reliable data allowing one to discriminate between deflection
> predicted by Newton's emission theory of light and deflection
> predicted by Divine Albert's Divine Theory, no matter how modern
> methods were used. Yet Einsteinians fiercely teach that in 1919 Arthur
> Eddington gloriously confirmed Divine Albert's Divine Theory.
>
> In 1960 Pound and Rebka measured the gravitational redshift factor to
> be 1+V/c^2, where V is the gravitational potential. Einsteinians
> fircely teach that this result was a glorious confirmation of Divine
> Albert's Divine Theory but close inspection shows that in fact it
> REFUTED Divine Albert's Divine Theory.
>
> In 1924 Arthur Eddington forced Walter Adams to cheat: Adams published
> the gravitational redshift suggested by Eddington and predicted by
> Divine Albert's Divine Theory, not the gravitational redshift he had
> really measured (the Sirius B fraud). Yet for 50 years this was
> regarded as the most reliable confirmation of Divine Albert's Divine
> Theory.
>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...@yahoo.com