🚀 go-pugleaf

> http://www.prlog.org/10308350-hubble-expansion-of-the-universe-by-dark-energy-is-negated-by-cosmic-dust.html
> "Hubble expansion of the Universe by Dark Energy is negated by Cosmic
> Dust (...) Had Einstein questioned Hubble’s finding on the grounds,
> say that the redshift measured was caused by DPs [dust particles], he
> might have rescinded to his original position that the Universe is
> static in dynamic equilibrium with itself. But Einstein did not,
> thereby initiating nearly a century of unfortunate research in
> astronomy that recently culminated in dark energy being adopted at
> the  Invisible Universe Conference, Ibid, "Invisible Universe
> Conference",  as the new cosmological paradigm only because dark
> energy is necessary to support an expanding Universe based on the
> falsity of Hubble’s redshift. (...) The Universe expansion velocities
> in excess of 80 Km/s based on recent redshift measurements of
> Supernova light are erroneous because the redshift is actually
> produced upon absorption of Supernova light in submicron cosmic dust.
> This is consistent with the MD [molecular dynamics] analysis showing
> imperceptibly small velocities, so as to suggest a static Universe as
> first proposed by Einstein."
>
> http://www.geocities.com/qedpressrelease/IntergalacticDust.htm
> "Just like household dust, cosmic dust can be a nuisance," said
> astronomer Ryan Scranton of the University of California, Davis.
> Scranton is part of a team of researchers from the Sloan Digital Sky
> Survey that have been analyzing the colors of distant quasars whose
> light passes in the vicinity of foreground galaxies on its way to the
> Earth. What they found is that the vast expanses of intergalactic
> space appear to be filled with a haze of tiny, smoke-like "dust"
> particles that dim the light from distant objects and subtly change
> their colors. “Galaxies contain lots of dust, most of it formed in the
> outer regions of dying stars," said team leader Brice Ménard of the
> Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics. "The surprise is that
> we are seeing dust hundreds of thousands of light-years outside of the
> galaxies, in intergalactic space." (...) Dust grains block blue light
> more effectively than red light. "We see this when the sun sets: light
> rays pass through a thicker layer of the atmosphere," said Scranton,
> "absorbing more and more blue light, causing the sun to appear
> reddened. We find similar reddening of quasars from intergalactic
> dust, and this reddening extends up to ten times beyond the apparent
> edges of the galaxies themselves."

Einsteinians cannot imagine life without dark energy:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090226093421.htm
"Intergalactic dust doesn't remove the need for dark energy to explain
current supernova data, Ménard explained, but it may complicate the
interpretation of high-precision distance measurements. "These
experiments are very ambitious in their goals," said Ménard, "and
subtle effects matter."

The awful assumption that dark energy does not exist makes
Einsteinians rediscover a forgotten procedure called REDUCTIO AD
ABSURDUM:

http://blogs.usatoday.com/sciencefair/2009/08/mystery-solved-dark-energy-isnt-there.html
"Discovered in 1998 with the finding that exploding stars in distant
galaxies are spreading away from us at an increasing speed, dark
energy has puzzled cosmologists for a decade, unable to understand a
force that acts across vast distances to push stars apart. Physicist
Michael Turner of the University of Chicago famously said that the
only thing really known about dark energy is its name. What's the
answer? It doesn't exist, suggest mathematicians Blake Temple and Joel
Smoller, in a study released Monday by the Proceedings of the National
Academies of Science. Instead, "expanding waves" from the Big Bang,
13.7 Billion years ago, are propelling the trillions of galaxies
filling the universe apart, suggests the study. Dark energy is an
illusion if their equations are right, and the universe, at least 27.2
billion light years across, is spreading at an increasing rate into an
even bigger vacuum empty of any matter, propelled by the energy of the
Big Bang. The only problem is that for the equations to work, we must
be "literally at the center of the universe, which is, to say the
least, unusual," says physicist Lawrence Krauss of Arizona State
University in Tempe."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com