🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #1203

Re: DOUBLETHINK IN EINSTEINIANA

#1203
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:00
52 lines
5158 bytes
> http://www.liferesearchuniversal.com/1984-17.html#seventeen
> George Orwell: "Doublethink means the power of holding two
> contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both
> of them. The Party intellectual knows in which direction his memories
> must be altered; he therefore knows that he is playing tricks with
> reality; but by the exercise of doublethink he also satisfies himself
> that reality is not violated. The process has to be conscious, or it
> would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to
> be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and
> hence of guilt. Doublethink lies at the very heart of Ingsoc, since
> the essential act of the Party is to use conscious deception while
> retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. To
> tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any
> fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary
> again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed,
> to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take
> account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably
> necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to
> exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is
> tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this
> knowledge ; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead
> of the truth."

Multiplethink in Einsteiniana:

http://www.answers.com/topic/gravitational-redshift
"The gravitational weakening of light from high-gravity stars was
predicted by John Michell in 1783 and Pierre-Simon Laplace in 1796,
using Isaac Newton's concept of light corpuscles (see: emission
theory) and who predicted that some stars would have a gravity so
strong that light would not be able to escape. The effect of gravity
on light was then explored by Johann Georg von Soldner (1801), who
calculated the amount of deflection of a light ray by the sun,
arriving at the Newtonian answer which is half the value predicted by
general relativity. All of this early work assumed that light could
slow down and fall, which was inconsistent with the modern
understanding of light waves. Once it became accepted that light is an
electromagnetic wave, it was clear that the frequency of light should
not change from place to place, since waves from a source with a fixed
frequency keep the same frequency everywhere. The only way around this
conclusion would be if time itself was altered - if clocks at
different points had different rates. This was precisely Einstein's
conclusion in 1911. He considered an accelerating box, and noted that
according to the special theory of relativity, the clock rate at the
bottom of the box was slower than the clock rate at the top. (...) The
changing rates of clocks allowed Einstein to conclude that light waves
change frequency as they move, and the frequency/energy relationship
for photons allowed him to see that this was best interpreted as the
effect of the gravitational field on the mass-energy of the photon."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <f3f293bf-cbd8-44c7-ab2f-2bf828d4e874@n11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!n11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <56ddf5a4-59ad-4025-992b-60d3cae136b2@32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <4a3933c5-7fad-4b56-aaed-c7f563a69820@z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <953263b2-8998-4076-a09d-b3eab195f072@h18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <7487f490-b668-41c9-93ba-bd9ebbaa97af@t13g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> <ce6e1e33-dc61-4347-b29f-80ab0dacfe4f@x3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <06257615-5a59-4e15-9f3c-f8afd59c8c7b@d4g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <0075a22f$0$9675$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <ecdf40d7-ebb4-4b54-b153-39cba723bacb@p23g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> <8a1880a3-faca-4ee4-ba53-c23470b4f2e1@w41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <1bc5fec2-24bf-442d-b428-68de57adfb34@g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 237b8ad48,75989829baf770f5
X-Google-Attributes: gid237b8ad48,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!n11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Subject: Re: DOUBLETHINK IN EINSTEINIANA
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <f3f293bf-cbd8-44c7-ab2f-2bf828d4e874@n11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
References: <56ddf5a4-59ad-4025-992b-60d3cae136b2@32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> 
 <4a3933c5-7fad-4b56-aaed-c7f563a69820@z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
 <953263b2-8998-4076-a09d-b3eab195f072@h18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
 <7487f490-b668-41c9-93ba-bd9ebbaa97af@t13g2000yqt.googlegroups.com>
 <ce6e1e33-dc61-4347-b29f-80ab0dacfe4f@x3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
 <06257615-5a59-4e15-9f3c-f8afd59c8c7b@d4g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
 <0075a22f$0$9675$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <ecdf40d7-ebb4-4b54-b153-39cba723bacb@p23g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
 <8a1880a3-faca-4ee4-ba53-c23470b4f2e1@w41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <1bc5fec2-24bf-442d-b428-68de57adfb34@g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.215.201.46
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1250672426 19290 127.0.0.1 (19 Aug 2009 09:00:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:00:26 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: n11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.215.201.46; 
 posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET 
 CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)