🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 1, 10:53 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In 1824 Sadi Carnot advanced a false premise and deduced a conclusion
> later called "the second law of thermodynamics":
>
> Kelvin's version: It is impossible to perform a cyclic process with no
> other result than that heat is absorbed from a reservoir, and work is
> performed.
>
> This implies that, when two INTERACTING heat engines absorb heat from
> a reservoir (the surroundings) and perform reversible work, the
> following equality of partial derivatives holds:
>
> dF1 / dX2 = dF2 / dX1
>
> where F1 and F2 are work-producing forces and X1 and X2 are the
> respective displacements.
>
> The above implication is more or less an oxymoron since the equality
> clearly characterizes NON-INTERACTING heat engines. At least in two
> cases (seehttp://www.wbabin.net/valev/valev2.htm) the partial
> derivatives are not equal and therefore the second law of
> thermodynamics is false.
>
> The next development of thermodynamics can be characterized in the
> following way:
>
> Camouflaging the falsehood of the second law of thermodynamics by
> introducing a red herring called "the law of entropy increase":
>
> http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000313/
> Jos Uffink: "This summary leads to the question whether it is fruitful
> to see irreversibility or time-asymmetry as the essence of the second
> law. Is it not more straightforward, in view of the unargued
> statements of Kelvin, the bold claims of Clausius and the strained
> attempts of Planck, to give up this idea? I believe that Ehrenfest-
> Afanassjewa was right in her verdict that the discussion about the
> arrow of time as expressed in the second law of the thermodynamics is
> actually a RED HERRING."
>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...@yahoo.com

Jep, we (they) need to go back to Æther physick's. The study of the
real wlrd.

Physics only involves the physiognomy of face value and illusionary
banking magick.

Its practitioners think they are on stage but in reality they are the
audience, victim, minion and provide themselves for a global plot of
mass murder.

:-(

Things work like this:

hypothesis > collect evidence > interpret > truth > scientific
revolution

The conversation lawyering boils down to.

hypothesis > false truth > death

_____

http://blog.go-here.nl/