🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mar 25, 1:48 pm, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:41:09 -0700 (PDT), Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Mar 24, 2:26 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote in
> >sci.physics.relativity:
> >> On Mar 23, 4:18 pm, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
> >> > On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:33:51 -0000, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > >"Dr. Henri Wilson" <hw@..> wrote in message
> >> > >news:ck3gs49ng1oq1ibl146j29is59vsqd1a9h@4ax.com...
> >> > >>I don't believe any of the experiments claiming measurement the bending of
> >> > >> light by the sun has been at all accurate. The reason I say this is that
> >> > >> the
> >> > >> movement of a star's image as it is seen to approach the sun's edge
> >> > >> progressively slows, stops then reverses, making it impossible to tell how
> >> > >> close the light rays are passing by the actual edge..and that is a crucial
> >> > >> factor. Eddington's experiment was just a publicity stunt and a farce.
>
> >> > >> Gravitational bending of light and lensing are a natural consequence of
> >> > >> Newtonian theory. Light is accelerated by gravity just like anything else.
> >> > >> It
> >> > >> is also slowed by interaction with the solar wind and the sun's
> >> > >> atmosphere.
>
> >> > >Most of it is the Coriolis effect.
> >> > >It take 8 minutes for light to travel from the Sun to Earth.
> >> > >In that time Earth travels 8 * 360/(1year * 365 days * 24 hours * 60
> >> > >minutes) =
> >> > >  0.0055 degrees or 0.33 arc minutes or 20 arc seconds from a straight
> >> > >line connecting the Earth, Sun and a distant star. Eddington was a dork.
> >> > >http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/(Gh)/guides/mtr/fw/gifs/coriolis.mov
>
> >> > Yes, the whole past procedure appears to be flawed. But Eddington and Einstein
> >> > knew there were thousands of little eric geeses around who would lap up
> >> > anything that resembled science fiction.
>
> >> Then look at the more recent observations. You do know there have been
> >> recent observations...right?
>
> >Earlier observations were fraud but recent are not....right? That is,
> >it was fraud that converted Albert the Plagiarist into Divine Albert
> >whereas recent observations just confirmed the Divinity....right?
>
> >http://www.cieletespace.fr/evenement/relativit-les-preuves-taient-fau...
> >RELATIVITE: LES PREUVES ETAIENT FAUSSES
> >"Le monde entier a cru pendant plus de cinquante ans à une théorie non
> >vérifiée. Car, nous le savons aujourdhui, les premières preuves,
> >issues notamment dune célèbre éclipse de 1919, nen étaient pas. Elles
> >reposaient en partie sur des manipulations peu avouables visant à
> >obtenir un résultat connu à lavance, et sur des mesures entachées
> >dincertitudes, quand il ne sagissait pas de fraudes caractérisées."
>
> >http://www.cieletespaceradio.fr/index.php/2008/05/26/390-histoire-des...
> >"Au début du XXème siècle, des scientifiques comme le Britannique
> >Arthur Eddington avaient tant à coeur de vérifier la théorie de la
> >relativité qu'ils ont tout mis en oeuvre pour que leurs expériences
> >soient probantes."
> >(ECOUTEZ!)
>
> >> > Nothing wrong with gravitational lensing though. It is plainly Newtonian.
>
> >> Except it is wrong by a factor of two.
>
> >Which equation is consistent with the gravitational redshift factor
> >1+V/c^2 experimentally confirmed by Pound and Rebka: Einstein's 1911
> >equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) given by Newton's emission theory of light, or
> >Einstein's 1915 "improved" equation c'=c(1+2V/c^2)?
>
> Good one Pencho.....when he fudged his equation to match the sun's supposed
> bending he stuffed it up for the Pound Rebka result.

Idiot. Einstein created his theory _before_ the observation was made.
The prediction came _before_ the observation.

>
> >Pentcho Valev
> >pva...@yahoo.com
>
> Harry Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>
> .....