🚀 go-pugleaf

On Feb 14, 11:59 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Einsteiniana was partially paralysed in 2008 when John Baez,
> Einsteiniana's most famous educator, sent this signal to Einsteinians
> all over the world who had been learning by rote every word of his
> teaching:
>
> http://www.edge.org/q2008/q08_5.html
> John Baez: "On the one hand we have the Standard Model, which tries to
> explain all the forces except gravity, and takes quantum mechanics
> into account. On the other hand we have General Relativity, which
> tries to explain gravity, and does not take quantum mechanics into
> account. Both theories seem to be more or less on the right track but
> until we somehow fit them together, or completely discard one or both,
> our picture of the world will be deeply schizophrenic.....I realized I
> didn't have enough confidence in either theory to engage in these
> heated debates. I also realized that there were other questions to
> work on: questions where I could actually tell when I was on the right
> track, questions where researchers cooperate more and fight less. So,
> I eventually decided to quit working on quantum gravity."
>
> And now the end of the story: Divine Albert's Divine Theory of
> Everything, that is, Divine Albert's Divine Money-Spinner, is a
> Mistake:
>
> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article5683551.ece
> "PROFESSOR Stephen Hawking is to publish a controversial new book
> suggesting Albert Einstein’s lifelong search for a “theory of
> everything” was probably a mistake.....Hawking said in a recent
> lecture, published on his website,www.hawking.org.uk:"Some people
> will be very disappointed if there is not an ultimate theory. I used
> to belong to that camp, but I have changed my mind. I'm now glad that
> our search for understanding will never come to an end."
>
> Curiously, French Einsteinians discovered this a few years ago and now
> all of them are "les héritiers de Maxwell, de Boltzmann et de
> Poincaré". No-one in France knows what the words "Albert Einstein"
> could possibly mean:
>
> http://www.rehseis.cnrs.fr/spip.php?article304
> "L’étonnante diversité des descriptions théoriques utilisées dans la
> physique d’hier et d’aujourd’hui est souvent perçue comme une
> faiblesse temporaire qu’il faudra corriger dans un état plus avancé de
> cette science. A l’opposé de cette attitude, les héritiers de Maxwell,
> de Boltzmann et de Poincaré soulignent les vertus épistémiques d’une
> diversité des descriptions et considèrent que décrire est un acte dont
> la dynamique transcende les objets originels de la description. Nous
> proposons de les suivre en explorant la manière dont les divers modes,
> niveaux et ordres de description dépendent des cultures scientifiques
> dans lesquels ils apparaissent et affectent notre capacité à résoudre
> des problèmes concrets, nous poussent à étudier de nouvelles sortes de
> phénomènes et suggèrent de nouveaux objets physiques."
>
> In 10 years relativity and Einstein's 1905 false light postulate will
> be referred to in the way "classical" thermodynamics and its second
> law are referred to in the following text:
>
> http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000313/
> "In the eyes of many modern physicists, the theory has acquired a
> somewhat dubious status. They regard classical thermodynamics as a
> relic from a bygone era... Indeed, the view that thermodynamics is
> obsolete is so common that many physicists use the phrase 'Second Law
> of Thermodynamics' to denote some counterpart of this law in the
> kinetic theory of gases or in statistical mechanics."
>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...@yahoo.com

Einstein tried to defy gravity. I have.

www.NewDirectionEurope.com/rv1.JPG